42Crunch
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to 42Crunch's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
42Crunch
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
9.64 from 17 reviews over
2 years on Gartner
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$20.6M
USD in 4 round from 2
investor
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
ISO/IEC 27001 | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB sections, 6
in common and 7 additional
|
8 KB
sections, 6 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
|||
|
Sync
training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (single user,
teams, enterprise). First 2 transparent
|
|
Minimum
commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
1 user
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
42Crunch
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
No information available
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65 standards, 2 in
common and 63 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
2 standards, all in
common
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 2 in
common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
3, 2 in
common and 1 additional
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
3,
2 in common and 1 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
42Crunch
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 2 in
common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
4
functionalities, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
14 sources
|
No
|
|
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
No information
available
|
|
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
SCA (AI
models)
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
No
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security
Testing
|
No
|
Yes. No
information available
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Environments
|
Left & Right
(included)
|
Same
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
42Crunch
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
None |
||
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
21, 2 in common and 19 additional |
|
|
CI/CD
|
20, 5 in
common and 15
additional
|
7, 5 in
common and 2 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
None |
||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Jun 13, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.