42Crunch
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to 42Crunch's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
42Crunch
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
9.64 from 17 reviews over
2 years on Gartner
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$20.6M
USD in 4 round
from 2
investor
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to
MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
ISO/IEC 27001 | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
|||
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB
sections, 6 in common and 7 additional
|
8 KB
sections, 6 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
|||
|
Sync
training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (single user,
teams, enterprise). First 2 transparent
|
|
Minimum
term
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
1 user
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
42Crunch
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day
vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No |
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not
applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some
requirements
from 67 standards, 4 in
common and 63 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
4 standards, all in
common
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 2
in
common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2, all in
common
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
3,
2 in common and 1 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
42Crunch
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 2 in
common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
4
functionalities, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority
criteria
|
No information
available
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source
SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source
SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security
testing
|
No
|
4 types
of APIs, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
2 types
of APIs, all in common
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
| MCP |
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
42Crunch
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
None |
||
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
3,
2 in common
and 1 additional
|
21, 2 in common and 19 additional |
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 5
in
common and 15
additional
|
7, 6 in
common and 1 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
None |
||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Nov 06, 2025.
More like 42Crunch
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free
trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.