Aikido
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Aikido's? The following comparison table enables you to discern
the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity
needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Aikido
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
143 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 26%, IT 6%, sales 26%,
marketing 6%, operations 2% and others 34%
|
|
|
Headcount growth
|
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
+57%, +155%, +615%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
BE | |
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
BE and US
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
Frost & Sullivan
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$24.6M USD in 3 rounds from 12
investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
||
|
CVEs as CNA Researcher
|
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II | |
|
Bug bounty
|
Yes | ||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
176K per month. Top 3: 16% US, 8% DE,
8% UK. Others
68%
|
|
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
Discovered and third-party
|
Discovered and third-party
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 3 in common
and 10 additional
|
3 documentation sections, all in common
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure and Github | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (basic, pro, scale). First 2 transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
|||
|
Minimum payment period
|
|||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
Containers, CSPM, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
10 users
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
|||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Aikido
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No. MPT
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No information available | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
No information available
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Min availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
None
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee or Freelance
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 6 in common and 61
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
8 standards, 6 in common and 2
additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
||
|
False positives
|
4.24 times better
|
6.67 times better
|
14% F0.5 score per quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
6.24 times better
|
17.95 times better
|
4% F2.0 score per severity
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
3, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 3 in common and 2
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Aikido
|
|
ASPM
|
|||
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3
additional
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
2 functionalities, all in common
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional
|
2, 1 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
|||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 11 in common and 12
additional
|
14 package managers, 11 in common and 3
additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
|||
|
SBOM
|
22 package managers, 7 in common and 15
additional
|
14 package managers, 7 in common and 7
additional
|
|
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12, all in common
|
16, 12 in common and 4 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No information available
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IaC
|
6, 2 in common and 4 additional
|
4, 1 in common and 3 additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
7 attack surface types, 1 in common and
6 additional
|
4 attack surface types, 1 in common and
3 additional
|
|
|
API security testing
|
No
|
4 types of APIs, 2 in common and 2
additional
|
2 types of APIs, all in common
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets types, 1 in common and 14
additional
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
1 secret type in common
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
2 functions, all in common
|
|
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Aikido
|
|
SCM
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, all in common
|
10, 3 in common and 7 additional
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
2 |
|
IDE
|
3, all in common
|
9, 3 in common and 6 additional
|
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 7 in common and 14 additional
|
7, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native and 1 integration
|
||
|
Container
|
Native and 4 integrations | ||
|
SAST
|
Native and 1 integration
|
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
CSPM
|
Native | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Dec 05, 2025.
More like Aikido
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.