Aikido
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Aikido's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Aikido
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
Maximum of 9.48 based on 55 reviews over 1.5 years from Capterra, G2, Gartner Peer Insights and TrustRadius
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$24.6M USD in 3 rounds from 12 investors
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
319 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide.
|
179 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II | |
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure and Github | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Aikido
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No. MPT
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No information available. |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No information available.
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
Chains vulnerabilities to reveal new, higher-impact ones.
|
No information available.
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research.
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Pending
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 6 in common and 59 additional.
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
8 standards, 6 in common and 2 additional.
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
4 remediation options, 3 in common and 2 additional.
|
Same, plus 1 remediation option.
|
3 remediation options, all in common.
|
|
Outputs
|
5 formats, 3 in common and 2 additional.
|
Same, plus 2 formats.
|
4 formats, 3 in common and 1 additional.
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Aikido
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional.
|
Same, plus 1 functionality.
|
2 functionalities in common.
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 12 in common and 11 additional.
|
14 package managers, 12 in common and 2 additional.
|
|
|
Reachability
|
5 languages.
|
Yes. No information available.
|
|
|
SBOM
|
14 package managers, 7 in common and 7 additional.
|
||
|
Containers
|
Yes. No information available. |
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
22 languages, 15 in common and 7 additional.
|
17 languages, 15 in common and 2 additional.
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
22 frameworks.
|
No information available. |
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary.
|
No
|
|
|
DAST
|
10 attack surface types, 3 in common and 7 additional.
|
6 attack surfaces, 3 in common and 3 additional. |
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets types, 1 in common and 14 additional.
|
Same, plus other obtained manually
|
1 secret type in common.
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional.
|
2 functions, all in common.
|
|
|
Fast and automatic
|
|||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
No incidents.
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Aikido
|
|
SCM integrations
|
4 integrations, all in common.
|
4 integrations, all in common.
|
|
|
Binary repositories integrations
|
None
|
None
|
12 integrations.
|
|
Ticketing integrations
|
3 integrations, all in common.
|
10 integrations, 3 in common and 7 additional. |
|
|
ChatOps integrations
|
None |
None
|
2 integrations. |
|
IDE integrations
|
2 integrations, all in common.
|
9 integrations, 2 in common and 7 additional. |
|
|
CI/CD integrations
|
35 integrations, 7 in common and 28 additional.
|
7 integrations, all in common.
|
|
|
SCA integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 1 integration. |
|
|
Container integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 4 integrations. |
|
|
SAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 1 integration. |
|
|
DAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
IAST integrations
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud integrations
|
3 integrations, all in common.
|
4 integrations, 3 in common and 1 additional.
|
|
|
CSPM integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) | |
|
Secrets integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
Compliance integrations
|
None
|
None
|
4 integrations.
|
References were last checked on Feb 17, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.