Black Duck
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Black Duck's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Black Duck
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
Maximum of 8.22 based on 149 reviews over 7 years from: G2, Gartner Peer Insights, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius.
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide.
|
26 CVEs reported to MITRE.
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
ISO/IEC 26262, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 and TISAX (automotive industry) |
|
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS, GCP and GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
PoC
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Black Duck
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
||
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | Yes |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
||
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
Chains vulnerabilities to reveal new, higher-impact ones.
|
Chains vulnerabilities to reveal new, higher-impact ones.
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
||
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
|
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
|
|
SLA
|
Response | ||
|
Accreditations
|
|||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Pending
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 14 in common and 51 additional.
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
23 standards, 14 in common and 9 additional.
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
4 remediation options, 3 in common and 1 additional.
|
Same, plus 1 remediation option.
|
3 remediation options, all in common.
|
|
Outputs
|
5 formats, 4 in common and 1 additional.
|
Same, plus 2 formats.
|
7 formats, 4 in common and 3 additional.
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Black Duck
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
IDE
|
3 functionalities, 1 in common and 2 additional.
|
1 functionality in common.
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Reachability
|
5 languages, 1 in common and 4 additional.
|
1 language in common.
|
|
|
SBOM
|
|||
|
Containers
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
24 languages, 14 in common and 10 additional.
|
Same, plus others
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
20 frameworks, 11 in common and 9 additional.
|
Same, plus others
|
78 frameworks, 11 in common and 67 additional. |
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary in common.
|
28 type of binaries, 1 in common and 27 additional.
|
|
|
DAST
|
5 attack surfaces, all in common.
|
9 attack surfaces, 5 in common and 4 additional. |
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
Secrets
|
16 secrets types, 5 in common and 11 additional.
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability.
|
9 secrets types, 5 in common and 4 additional.
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional.
|
1 function in common.
|
|
|
Fast and automatic
|
|||
|
Open source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Black Duck
|
|
SCM integrations
|
4 integrations, all in common.
|
4 integrations, all in common.
|
|
|
Binary repositories integrations
|
None
|
None
|
6 integrations.
|
|
Ticketing integrations
|
3 integrations, 2 in common and 1 additional.
|
3 integrations, 2 in common and 1 additional. |
|
|
ChatOps integrations
|
None |
None
|
2 integrations. |
|
IDE integrations
|
9 integrations, 2 in common and 7 additional. |
||
|
CI/CD integrations
|
23 integrations, 11 in common and 12 additional.
|
12 integrations, all in common.
|
|
|
SCA integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 13 integrations. |
|
|
Container integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 4 integrations. |
|
|
SAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 27 integrations. |
|
|
DAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 13 integrations. |
|
|
IAST integrations
|
None |
None
|
Native scanner and 3 integrations
|
|
Cloud Integrations
|
|||
|
CSPM integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 2 integrations | |
|
Secrets integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
Compliance integrations
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Dec 17, 2024.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.