Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Bright Security | Fluid Attacks

Bright Security

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Bright Security's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Bright
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount

112

Headcount distribution
Headcount growth
+5%, +4%, +7%
Headquarters
Countries
CO and US
Reputation
9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.71 from 36 reviews over 2 years on G2 and Gartner
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
13K based on the following: FacebookLinkedInX and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$30.3M USD in 4 rounds from 7 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
None
Revenue
1M to 15M
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked among the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
Bug bounty
Visits
19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others: 27%
47K per month. Top 326% IN, 21% US, 4% GE and others 49%
Authority
Vulnerability database
None
Content
Knowledge base
13 KB sections, 6 in common and 7 additional
KB sections, 6 in common and 1 additional
Community
No
Sync training
No
Async training
No
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 10 partners
Marketplaces AWSAzure and GitHub
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Open Demo
No
No
No
Pricing
Pricing tiers
1 plan
Minimum term
Minimum payment period
Minimum capabilities
Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR
Minimum scope
1 scan
Pricing drivers
Minimum monthly payment

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Bright
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
No
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
None
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 67 standards, 11 in common and 56 additional
All requirements from the same standards
11 standards, all in common
Detection method
Remediation
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1
3, all in common
Outputs
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 2
4, 1 in common and 3 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Bright
ASPM
No
API
IDE
functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
functionalities, all in common
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources
No information available
Threat model alignment
No
Priority criteria
No information available
Custom prioritization
No
Scanner origin
SCA
No
AI security
No
No
Reachability
No
Reachability type
Not applicable
SBOM
No
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
No
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
No
Source SAST
(languages)
No
Source SAST
(frameworks)

No

Custom rules
No
No
No
IaC
6
4
No
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
No
DAST
7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional

attacks surface types, 5 in common and 1 additional

API security testing
No
4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1 additional
3 types of APIs, all in common
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
2 functions, all in common
MCP
No
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Bright
SCM
None
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, all in common

4, 3 in common and 1 additional

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

1 in common

CI/CD
21, 7 in common and 14 additional
8, 7 in common and 1 additional
SCA

None

Container

None

SAST

1

DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
None
Compliance
None
None
None

Note on reference check date
 References were last checked on Oct 29, 2025.


Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.