Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Bright Security | Fluid Attacks

Bright Security

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Bright Security's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Bright Security
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Employees

103

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.54 from 32 reviews over 1 year on G2 and Gartner
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
11K based on the following: FacebookLinkedInX and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$25.3M USD in 4 rounds from 6 investors
Revenue
0.1M to 50M
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked among the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
None
Compliance
Documentation
Visits
26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%
94K per month. Top 3: 16% DE, 13% IN, 13% KE and others 58%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 10 partners
Marketplaces AWSAzure and GitHub
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Bright Security
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
No information available
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 11 in common and 54 additional
All requirements from the same standards
11 standards, all in common
Detection method
Remediation
5, 2 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1
2, all in common
Outputs
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 2
4, 1 in common and 3 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Bright Security
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
functionalities, all in common
CLI
CI/CD
SCA
No
Reachability
No
SBOM
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
Same, plus 4
No
Source SAST (frameworks)

No

Binary SAST
1 type of binary
No
DAST
10 attack surface types, 8 in common and 2 additional

attacks surface types, 8 in common and 1 additional

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
No
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Bright Security
SCM
None
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, all in common

4, 3 in common and 1 additional

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE
2, 1 in common and 1 additional

1 in common

CI/CD
20, 7 in common and 13 additional
8, 7 in common and 1 additional
SCA

None

Container

None

SAST

1

DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Compliance
None
None
None

Note on reference check date
 References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.