Burp Suite
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Burp Suite's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Burp Suite
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$113.3M
USD
in 1 round from 1
investor
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to
MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to
MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO/IEC 27001 | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
|||
|
Knowledge
base
|
|||
|
Community
|
|||
|
Sync
training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
Security education
platform
(subscription based)
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its
195 partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans
(DAST, professional). Second transparent
|
|
Minimum
term
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
1 user
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Burp Suite
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not
applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 5 in common and 62 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
5 standards, all in common
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
False positives
|
29.59 times better
|
46.54 times better
|
2% F0.5 score per quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
51.76 times better
|
148.84 times better
|
0.5% F2.0 score per severity
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 2 in
common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2,
all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
3,
1 in common and 2 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Burp Suite
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
4 sources
|
No information availability
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source
SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source
SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
7 attack
surface types, 6 in common and 1 additional
|
7 attack surface types, 6 in common and 1 additional |
|
|
API security
Testing
|
No
|
4 types
of APIs, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
3 types of APIs,
all in common
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
Yes. No
information available
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions,
none in common
|
||
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Burp Suite
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in
common and 1
additional
|
2, all in common |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
21, 5 in common and 16 additional
|
5,
all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
None |
||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Oct 30, 2025.
More like BurpSuite
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free
trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.