Burp Suite
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Burp Suite's? The following comparison table enables you to
discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's
cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Burp Suite
|
|
Focus
|
DAST
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
Pentesting tools
|
|
Headcount
|
261 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 22%, IT 8%, sales 8%,
marketing 2%, operations 5% and others 55%
|
|
|
Headcount growth
|
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
+6%, +19%, +41%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
UK and US | |
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
IN and UK
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
9.59 from 381 reviews over 10 years on
Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
316K based on the following: Facebook,
Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
|
|
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
Gartner
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2003
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$113.3M USD in 1 round from 1 investor
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
10M to 50M
|
|
|
CVEs as CNA Researcher
|
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus and ISO/IEC 27001 | |
|
Bug bounty
|
Yes
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR,
7% US. Others 59%
|
1.5M per month. Top 3: 17% IN, 15% US,
5% CN. Others 63%
|
|
|
Authority
|
58 out of 100
|
||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, documentation, support and videos
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 3 in common
and 10 additional
|
7 documentation sections, 3 in common
and 4 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
Chat (discord)
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
Security education
platform(subscription based)
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its 195 partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Free trial
|
PoC
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and public web
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (DAST, professional). Second
transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
DAST
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
1 user
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Users
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
Yes
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Burp Suite
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee or freelance
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 5 in common and 62
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
5 standards, all in common
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools and AI
|
|
|
False positives
|
29.59 times better
|
46.54 times better
|
2% F0.5 score per quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
51.76 times better
|
148.84 times better
|
0.5% F2.0 score per severity
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Burp Suite
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
REST and GraphQL with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
No information availability
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
In-house
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
Actions
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
7 attack surface types, 6 in common and
1 additional
|
7 attack surface types, 6 in common
and 1 additional
|
|
|
API security testing
|
No
|
4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1
additional
|
3 types of APIs, all in common
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, none in common
|
3 functions, none in common
|
|
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS (no tenancy information) +
on-premises (single tenant)
|
||
| Regions |
US
|
||
|
Status
|
Yes
|
||
|
Incidents
|
0.3 per year
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Burp Suite
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
2, all in common
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
1 |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
21, 5 in common and 16 additional
|
5, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
None
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
None
|
||
|
DAST
|
Native
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
Native
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary source of information was portswigger.net, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like BurpSuite
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.