Data Theorem
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Data Theorem's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Data Theorem
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
|||
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB sections
|
No
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync
training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure, GCP and GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
30-day
free trial and PoC
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (basic,
standard, enterprise). All transparent
|
|
Minimum
commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Data Theorem
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
No information available
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No information available
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65 standards, 9 in common and 56 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
14, 9 in common and 4 additional
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
1 in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
1 in common
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Data Theorem
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
14 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
Yes. No information
available
|
||
|
SCA (AI
models)
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12,
8 in common and 4 additional
|
10, 8 in
common and 2 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No information available |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
Yes.
No information available
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary in common
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries. All in common
|
5 types of binaries, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
|
DAST
|
Yes. No information available |
||
|
API security
Testing
|
No
|
4 types of APIs in common
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
Yes. No information
available
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
Environments
|
Left & Right
(included)
|
Same
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
Yes.
No information available
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Data Theorem
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
3, 1 in common and 2
additional
|
1 in common |
|
|
CI/CD
|
20, 3 in
common and 17 additional
|
7, 3 in common and 4 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
Native | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Jun 13, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.