DataDog
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to DataDog's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DataDog
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$1B USD in 9 rounds from 16 investors |
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
Acquired 0 times and made
16
acquisitions
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
CSA STAR Level 1, DORA, EU-US DPF, FedRAMP, HIPAA, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, PCI DSS, SOC 2, SOC 2 Type I and TISAX | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
|||
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB sections, 2
in common and 11 additional
|
7 KB sections, 2 in common and
5 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
|||
|
Sync
training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
Security education platform
(subscription based)
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure, GCP and GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
|
Minimum
term
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DataDog
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
Availability and support | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
>= 99.8% per month
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 67 standards, 17 in common and 50 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
26 standards, 17 in common and 9 additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools and AI | ||
|
Remediation
|
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
4, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
9, 2 in common and 7 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
DataDog
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
3 functionalities, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
4 sources, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
3 sources, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 11 in common and 12 additional
|
14 package managers, 11 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
22 package managers, 11 in common and 11 additional
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
4 distributions, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
16 distributions, 3 in common and 13 additional
|
|
|
Source
SAST
(languages)
|
12, 9 in common and 3 additional
|
10, 9 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Source
SAST
(frameworks)
|
No information available |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IaC
|
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
|
4, none in common
|
3, all in common
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security
testing
|
No
|
4 types
of APIs, 1 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets
types, 5 in common and 10 additional
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
7 secrets types, 5 in common and 2 additional
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
MCP
|
|||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DataDog
|
|
SCM
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, all in common
|
7, 3 in common and 4 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
3, all in common
|
7, 3 in common and 4 additional |
|
|
CI/CD
|
20, 13 in common and 7 additional
|
21, 13 in common and 8 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native and 5 integrations |
||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
Native and 2 integrations
|
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
Native and 1 integration
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
Native and 14 integrations | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Oct 06, 2025.
More like DataDog
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.