DeepSource
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to DeepSource's? The following comparison table enables you to
discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's
cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DeepSource
|
|
Focus
|
In-house scanners
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
Code quality and SCA
|
|
Headcount
|
18 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 61% and others 39%
|
|
|
Headcount growth
|
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
0%, +13%, +6%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
IN and US | |
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
IN and US
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
9.69 from 34 reviews over 3 years on
Capterra, G2 and Gartner
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
8K based on the following: Facebook,
Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
|
|
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2018
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
7.6 USDM USD in 2 round from 6
investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
1M to 10M
|
|
|
CVEs as CNA Researcher
|
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
SOC 2 Type II | |
|
Bug bounty
|
Yes
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
38K per month. Top 3: 32% CN, 17% US,
8% IN. Others 43%
|
|
|
Authority
|
36 out of 100
|
||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, documentation, glossary and
videos
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 9 in common
and 4 additional
|
12 documentation sections, 9 in common
and 3 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
Forum
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct
|
|
| Marketplaces | GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Free trial
|
14-day free trial
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales, marketplace and public
web
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (starter, business,
enterprise). First 2 transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
Code Coverage, IaC, SAST and secrets
detection
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
No information available
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
No information available
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
8 USD
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DeepSource
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
Availability and response | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
>=99.5% per month
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee and freelance
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 2 in common and 65
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
2 standards, all in common
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools and AI
|
|
|
False positives
|
144.14 times better
|
226.71 times better
|
0.4% F0.5 score per quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
258.38 times better
|
742.95 times better
|
0.1% F2.0 score per severity
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
3, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
1 in common
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
DeepSource
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
GraphQL with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 3 in common and 2
additional
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
4 functionalities, 3 in common and 1
additional
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS v4.0 and EPSS
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
In-house
|
||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 14 in common and 9
additional
|
16 package managers, 14 in common and 2
additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages, 2 in common and 10
additional
|
2 languages, all in common
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Deterministic
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12, 10 in common and 2 additional
|
13, 10 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No information available
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
2 functions, all in common
|
|
|
MCP
|
No | ||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises (no tenancy
information)
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
Yes
|
||
|
Incidents
|
0.7 per year
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DeepSource
|
|
SCM
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
1 |
|
IDE
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 3 in common and 18 additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
Native
|
||
|
DAST
|
None
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
Native
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
1
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information
were deepsource.com and docs.deepsource.com, which were supplemented by specialized
information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.