DeepSource
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to DeepSource's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DeepSource
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
Code quality and SCA
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$7.6M
USD in 2 round from 2 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB sections, 9
in common and 4 additional
|
12 KB sections, 9 in
common and 3 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
|||
|
Sync
training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (starter,
business, enterprise). First 2 transparent
|
|
Minimum
commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
No information available
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
No information available
|
||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DeepSource
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
Availability and response | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
>=99.5% per month
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65 standards, 2 in
common and 63 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
2 standards, all
in common
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 3 in
common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
3,
all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
1 in
common
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
DeepSource
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 3 in
common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
4 functionalities,
3 in common and 1 additional
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
14 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
24 package managers, 16 in
common and 8 additional
|
16 package
managers, all in common
|
|
|
SCA (AI
models)
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages, 2 in common
and 10 additional
|
2 languages,
all in common
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
|||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12,
10 in common and 2 additional
|
13,
10 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No information available |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
Yes.
No information available
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security
Testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Environments
|
Left & Right
(included)
|
Same
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
Yes. No
information available
|
|
|
AI
|
4 functions,
2 in common and 2 additional
|
2 functions,
all in common
|
|
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DeepSource
|
|
SCM
|
4, all in
common
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2
additional
|
1 in common |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common |
|
|
CI/CD
|
20, 3 in
common and 17
additional
|
3, all
in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Jun 13, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.