DefectDojo
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to DefectDojo's? The following comparison table enables you to
discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's
cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DefectDojo
|
|
Focus
|
Vulnerability management
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
23 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 26%, IT 13%, sales 17%,
marketing 13%, operations 4% and others 27%
|
|
|
Headcount growth
|
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
-12%, -12%, +28%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
US
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
US
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
8.48 from 15 reviews over 5 years on
Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
3K based on the following: LinkedIn, X
and YouTube
|
|
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
IDC
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2017
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$7M USD in 1 round from 2 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
1M to 5M
|
|
|
CVEs as CNA Researcher
|
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
None | |
|
Bug bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
18K per month. Top 3: 17% CO, 14% PK,
11% IN. Others 58%
|
|
|
Authority
|
28 out of 100
|
||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, data sheets, documentation and
events
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 5 in common
and 8 additional
|
8 documentation sections, 5 in common
and 3 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
Chat (slack)
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Free trial
|
14-day free trial
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open demo
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and marketplace
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (team, business). All
transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
Vulnerability management
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
20,000 finding
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Findings
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DefectDojo
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
Support (only for Pro version) | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 7 in common and 60
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
9 standards, 7 in common and 2
additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
1 in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 2 in common and 3
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
DefectDojo
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes
|
||
|
API
|
REST with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
EPSS and KEV
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
Workflows
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 1 in common and 2
additional
|
5 functions, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
|
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
BSD 3-Clause License
|
|
|
Provisioning as code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises (no tenancy
information)
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
DefectDojo
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
2 |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
6
|
||
|
Container
|
21 | ||
|
SAST
|
24
|
||
|
DAST
|
21
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
2
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information
were defectdojo.com and docs.defectdojo.com, which were supplemented by specialized
information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like DefectDojo
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.