Devel
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Devel's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers
across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity
needs. To better understand each attribute,
read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Devel
|
|
Focus
|
MPT
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
Blue team, purple team and red team
|
| Headcount | 49 | ||
| Headcount distribution |
Engineering 42%, IT 14%, sales 15%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 25%
|
Engineering 16%, IT 20%, sales 8%, marketing 2%, operations 2%
and others 52%
|
|
| Headcount growth |
+14%, +15%, -1%
|
-11%, -22%, -28%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO
and US
|
CO, DO, GT, HN, MX, PA, SV and US
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US
|
GT, PK and SV
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
12K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and
YouTube
|
|
| Research firms |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2005
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M
to 15M
|
1M to 11M
|
|
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II
and
SOC 3
|
ISO/IEC 9001, ISO/IEC 27001, PCI DSS and SOC 2 Type II
|
|
| Bug bounty |
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
22K
per month. Top 3: 34% PE, 33% CO, 6% CL. Others 27%
|
5K per month. Top 3: 40% MX, 28% ES, 7% AR. Others 25%
|
|
|
Authority
|
31 out of 100
|
||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
Discovered
and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog
|
|
|
Comprehensive documentation
|
No
|
||
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1
workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3
product use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct
|
|
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
No
|
||
|
Demo
|
No
|
||
| Open demo |
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1
plan
|
1
plan
|
No information available
|
|
Minimum term
|
No information available
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
No information available
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets
|
Same plus:
AI SAST, API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
MPT
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1
author
|
No information available
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No information available
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Devel
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No. MPT
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No information available | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
No information available
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous
zero-day
vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
99.95%
per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
3 from 3 different types
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
No information available
|
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65
standards, 2 in common and 63 additional
|
All requirements from the same
standards
|
No information available
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools,
AI
and human intelligence
|
Human intelligence
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, none in common
|
Same, plus
1
|
1
|
|
Outputs
|
Same, plus
2
|
No information available
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Devel
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
No
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4
sources
|
None
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
No information available
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12
languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of
binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
| Open-source |
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
| Provisioning as code |
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
No
|
||
| Regions |
None
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Devel
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
None
|
||
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
None
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
None
|
||
|
DAST
|
None
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
Secrets
|
None
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
| Bug bounty |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Feb 09, 2026. The
primary sources of information was devel.group, which was
supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media,
and other sources.
More like Devel
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks'
automated security testing! Start your
21-day free trial
and discover the benefits of the
Continuous Hacking
Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of
Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out
this contact form.