Fortify
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Fortify's? The following comparison table enables you to discern
the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity
needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
This comparison focuses exclusively on the product itself,
even though it belongs to a larger parent company. All information collected is based on the product’s
technical, functional, and theoretical capabilities, not on attributes of the parent company.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Fortify
|
|
Focus
|
Native ASPM with in-house scanners
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) | |
|
Headcount growth
|
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
Indeterminable (no information for this
product alone)
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
Indeterminable (no information for this
product alone)
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
Indeterminable (no information for this
product alone)
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
9.22 from 187 reviews over 9 years on
G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
Indeterminable (no information for this
product alone)
|
|
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
Gartner and Info-Tech Research Group
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
Indeterminable (no information for
this product alone)
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$19M USD in 3 rounds from 2 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
Acquired 3 times and made 1 acquisition
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) | |
|
CVEs as CNA Researcher
|
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
CSA STAR and FedRAMP
|
|
|
Bug bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
Indeterminable (no information for this
product alone)
|
|
|
Authority
|
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone) | ||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, data sheets, documentation,
success stories, videos and webinars
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 4 in common
and 9 additional
|
4 documentation sections, all in common
|
|
|
Community
|
Forum by OpenText
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
3 product use courses by OpenText
(subscription-based)
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
15-day free trial and PoV
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open demo
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and marketplaces
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
No information available
|
|
Minimum term
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
No information available
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
1 assessment unit
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Applications
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
83 USD
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No information available |
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Fortify
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
Scan time |
||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
Amazon Linux Ready Product, AWS Outposts Ready Product, Data & Analytics ISV Competency, Security ISV Competency and CNA (as OpenText) | ||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 18 in common and 49
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
19 standards, 18 in common and 1
additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools and AI
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
4, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 3 in common and 2
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Fortify
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes
|
||
|
API
|
REST with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3
additional
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
7 functionalities, 2 in common and 5
additional
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
| Vulnerability sources |
4 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
No information available
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
In-house
|
||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 11 in common and 12
additional
|
15 package managers, 11 in common and 4
additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages, 2 in common and 10
additional
|
2 languages, all in common
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Deterministic
|
||
|
SBOM
|
22 package managers, 10 in common and 12
additional
|
15 package managers, 10 in common and 5
additional
|
|
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12, all in common
|
24, 12 in common and 12 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
22, 1 in common and 21 additional
|
7, 1 in common and 6 additional
|
|
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
IaC
|
6, 5 in common and 1 additional
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
8, 7 in common and 1 additional |
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries. None
in common
|
3 types of binaries, none in common
|
|
DAST
|
7 attack surface types, 5 in common and
2 additional
|
6 attack surface types, 5 in common
and 1 additional
|
|
|
API security testing
|
No
|
4 types of APIs, all in common
|
7 types of APIs, 4 in common and 3
additional
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12
additional
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
7 secrets types, 3 in common and 4
additional
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, all in common
|
3 functions, all in common
|
|
|
MCP
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information)
|
||
| Regions |
AMS, APAC, EMEA and SGP
|
||
|
Status
|
Yes
|
||
|
Incidents
|
10.3 per year
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Fortify
|
|
SCM
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
1 |
|
IDE
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 6 in common and 15 additional
|
7, 6 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native and 5 integrations
|
||
|
Container
|
1 | ||
|
SAST
|
Native
|
||
|
DAST
|
Native and 1 integration
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
Native
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
2
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 22, 2025. The primary sources of information
were opentext.com and microfocus.com, which were supplemented by specialized
information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Fortify
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.