Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Fortify | Fluid Attacks

Fortify

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Fortify's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Fortify
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
Headcount

22,739

Headcount distribution
Headcount growth
0%, 0%, +3%
Headquarters
Countries
 CO and US
AUBRCA, CR, DE and US
Reputation
9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.22 from 187 reviews over 9 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
530K based on the following: Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$19M USD in 3 rounds from 2 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
Acquired 3 times and made 1 acquisition
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
Not applicable
Compliance
Bug bounty
Yes
Yes
No
Visits
19K per month. Top 350% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%
964K per month. Top 3: 30% US, 15% IN, 10% CA and others 45%
Authority
Vulnerability database
None
Content
Knowledge base
13 KB sections, 4 in common and 9 additional
4 KB sections, all in common
Community
Sync training
No
No
No
Async training
3 product use courses (subscription-based)
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with partners
Marketplaces AWS and Azure
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing tiers
No information availability
Minimum commit
Minimum payment period
Minimum capabilities

Same plus: PTaaSRE and SCR

No information available
Minimum scope
Pricing drivers
Minimum monthly payment

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Fortify
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
Scan time
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
Same
No information availability
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
No
Accreditations
Amazon Linux Ready Product, AWS Outposts Ready Product, Data & Analytics ISV Competency, Security ISV Competency and CNA
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 18 in common and 47 additional
All requirements from the same standards
19 standards, 18 in common and 1 additional
Detection method
Remediation
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
Same, plus 1
4, all in common
Outputs
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 2
6, 3 in common and 3 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Fortify
ASPM
Yes
No
API
Same
IDE
5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
7 functionalities, 2 in common and 5 additional
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources Same
No information available
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSFEPSS and KEV
No information available
Custom prioritization
No
Scanner origin
In-house
SCA
24 package managers, 11 in common and 13 additional
15 package managers, 11 in common and 4 additional
AI security
No
No
Reachability
12 languages
No
Reachability type
No
SBOM
22 package managers, 10 in common and 12 additional
15 package managers, 10 in common and 5 additional
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
No
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
12, all in common
24, 12 in common and 12 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)
22, 1 in common and 21 additional

7, 1 in common and 6 additional

Custom rules
No
No
IaC
6, 5 in common and 1 additional
4, 2 in common and 2 additional 8, 7 in common and 1 additional
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
3 types of binaries, none in common
DAST
7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional

6 attack surface types, 5 in common and 1 additional

API security testing
No
4 types of APIs, all in common
7 types of APIs, 4 in common and 3 additional
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Environments
Left & Right (included)
Same
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
7 secrets types, 3 in common and 4 additional
AI
4 functions, 3 in common and 1 additional
3 functions, all in common
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Fortify
SCM
4
4, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

5, 1 in common and 4 additional

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

4, 2 in common and 2 additional

CI/CD
20, 5 in common and 15 additional
6, 5 in common and 1 additional
SCA
Container

1

SAST
DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, all in common
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
CSPM
None
Secrets
Remediation
None
None
2
Bug bounty
None
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
None
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Aug 28, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.