Fortify
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Fortify's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Fortify
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
Maximum of 9.33 based on 177 reviews over 8 years from: G2, Gartner Peer Insights, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius.
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
19M USD in 3 rounds from 2 investors (1 acquisitions)
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide.
|
119 CVEs reported to MITRE (Open Text Corporation)
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
CSA STAR, CMMC, FedRamp, ISO/IEC 9001 and TISAX |
|
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
54 out of 100 (Open Text Corporation)
|
||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure and GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
15-day free trial and PoV
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Fortify
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
Chains vulnerabilities to reveal new, higher-impact ones.
|
No
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
|
No
|
|
SLA
|
Scan time |
||
|
Accreditations
|
|||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 18 in common and 47 additional.
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
19 standards, 18 in common and 1 additional.
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5 remediation options, 4 in common and 1 additional.
|
Same, plus 1 remediation option.
|
4 remediation option, all in common.
|
|
Outputs
|
5 formats, 2 in common and 5 additional.
|
Same, plus 2 formats.
|
5 formats, 2 in common and 3 additional.
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Fortify
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
IDE
|
3 functionalities, 1 in common and 2 additional.
|
1 functionality in common.
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
15 package managers, 8 in common and 7 additional.
|
||
|
Reachability
|
5 languages, 4 in common and 1 additional.
|
No
|
|
|
SBOM
|
|||
|
Containers
|
No |
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
17 languages, all in common.
|
37 languages, 17 in common and 20 additional.
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
20 frameworks, 3 in common and 17 additional.
|
Same, plus others
|
4 frameworks, 3 in common and 1 additional. |
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary.
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries.
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
DAST
|
5 attack surfaces, all in common.
|
13 attack surfaces, 5 in common and 8 additional. |
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets types, 2 in common and 13 additional.
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability.
|
2 secrets types, all in common.
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, all in common.
|
3 functions, all in common.
|
|
|
Fast and automatic
|
|||
|
Open source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Fortify
|
|
SCM integrations
|
4 integrations, all in common.
|
4 integrations, all in common.
|
|
|
Binary repositories integrations
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing integrations
|
3 integrations, 1 in common and 2 additional.
|
4 integrations, 1 in common and 3 additional. |
|
|
ChatOps integrations
|
None |
None
|
1 integration. |
|
IDE integrations
|
4 integrations, 2 in common and 2 additional. |
||
|
CI/CD integrations
|
26 integrations, 6 in common and 20 additional.
|
6 integrations, all in common.
|
|
|
SCA integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 5 integrations. |
|
|
Container integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
1 integration. |
|
|
SAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
DAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner and 1 integration. |
|
|
IAST integrations
|
None |
None
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
|
Cloud Integrations
|
4 integrations, 3 in common and 1 additional.
|
||
|
CSPM integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
None | |
|
Secrets integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
Compliance integrations
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Dec 30, 2024.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.