Fortify

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Fortify's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Fortify
Focus	Native ASPM with In-house scanners	AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners	In-house scanners
Extras	None	None	Analytics Cloud, Business Network Cloud, Content Cloud, DevOps Cloud, Experience Cloud and IT Operations Cloud
Headcount	136	Same	22,739
Headcount distribution	Engineering 40%, TI 15%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%	Same	Engineering 29%, TI 14%, sales 12%, marketing 2%, operations 5% and others 38%
Headcount growth	+3%, -2%, -7%	Same	0%, 0%, +3%
Headquarters	86% CO	Same	27% IN
Countries	CO and US	Same	AU, BR, CA, CR, DE and US
Reputation	9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch	Same	9.22 from 187 reviews over 9 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius
Followers	20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube	Same	530K based on the following: Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms	None	None	451 Research, Forrester, Gartner and Info-Tech Research Group
Founded	2001	Same	1991
Funding	Bootstrapped	Same	$19M USD in 3 rounds from 2 investors
Acquisitions	None	None	Acquired 3 times and made 1 acquisition
Revenue	5M to 10M	Same	1B to 10B
CVE	257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide	Same	Not applicable
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3	Same	CSA STAR and FedRAMP
Bug bounty	Yes	Yes	No
Visits	19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%	Same	964K per month. Top 3: 30% US, 15% IN, 10% CA and others 45%
Authority	32 out of 100	Same	52 out of 100
Vulnerability database	Discovered	Same	None
Content	Blog, documentation, e-books, reports, videos, webinars and white papers	Same	Blog, data sheets, documentation, videos and webinars
Knowledge base	13 KB sections, 4 in common and 9 additional	Same	4 KB sections, all in common
Community	Forum	Same	Forum
Sync training	No	No	No
Async training	3 product use courses, all free	Same	3 product use courses (subscription-based)
Distribution	Direct or with any of its 14 partners	Same	Direct or with partners
Marketplaces	AWS	Same	AWS and Azure
Freemium	No	No	No
Free trial	21-day free trial	PoV	15-day free trial and PoV
Demo	Yes	Yes	Yes
Pricing	Contact sales and marketplace	Contact sales	Contact sales and marketplaces
Pricing tiers	1 plan	1 plan	No information availability
Minimum commit	Monthly	Monthly	Annually
Minimum payment period	Monthly	Monthly	Annually
Minimum capabilities	API security testing, ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets	Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR	No information available
Minimum scope	1 group	1 author	1 AU assessment units
Pricing drivers	Groups	Authors	Applications
Minimum monthly payment	1.529 USD	1.529 + 429 USD	83 USD

Service

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Fortify
PTaaS	No	Yes	No
Reverse engineering	No	Yes	No
Secure code review	No	Yes	No
Pivoting	No	Yes	No
Exploitation	No	Yes	No
Manual reattacks	Not applicable	Unlimited reattacks	Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities	None	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research	None
SLA	Availability	Accuracy, availability and response	Scan time
Min availability	>=99.95% per minute LTM	Same	No information availability
After-sale guarantees	No	Yes	No
Accreditations	CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST	Same	Amazon Linux Ready Product, AWS Outposts Ready Product, Data & Analytics ISV Competency, Security ISV Competency and CNA
Hacker certifications	Not applicable	202 from 59 different types	Not applicable
Type of contract	Employee	Same	Employee
Endpoint control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Channel control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Standards	Some requirements from 65 standards, 18 in common and 47 additional	All requirements from the same standards	19 standards, 18 in common and 1 additional
Detection method	Automated tools	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence	Automated tools
Remediation	5, 4 in common and 1 additional	Same, plus 1	4, all in common
Outputs	5, 3 in common and 2 additional	Same, plus 2	6, 3 in common and 3 additional

Product

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Fortify
ASPM	Yes	Yes	No
API	GraphQL with JSON	Same	REST with JSON
IDE	5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional	Same, plus 1 functionality	7 functionalities, 2 in common and 5 additional
CLI	Yes	Yes	Yes
CI/CD	Breaks the build	Same	Breaks the build
Vulnerability sources	4 sources	Same	No information available
Priority criteria	CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV	Same	No information available
Custom prioritization	Priority score	Same	No
Scanner origin	In-house	In-house	In-house
SCA	24 package managers, 11 in common and 13 additional	Same	15 package managers, 11 in common and 4 additional
AI security	No	Yes	No
Reachability	12 languages	Same	No
Reachability type	Deterministic	Same	No
SBOM	22 package managers, 10 in common and 12 additional	Same	15 package managers, 10 in common and 5 additional
Malware detection	Yes	Yes	No
Autofix on components	No	No	No
Containers	4 distributions	Same	No
Source SAST (languages)	12, all in common	Same	24, 12 in common and 12 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)	22, 1 in common and 21 additional	Same	7, 1 in common and 6 additional
Custom rules	No	No	Yes
IaC	6, 5 in common and 1 additional	4, 2 in common and 2 additional	8, 7 in common and 1 additional
Binary SAST	1 type of binary	Same, plus 2 types of binaries	3 types of binaries, none in common
DAST	7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional	Same	6 attack surface types, 5 in common and 1 additional
API security testing	No	4 types of APIs, all in common	7 types of APIs, 4 in common and 3 additional
IAST	No	No	No
CSPM	Yes	Yes	No
Environments	Left & Right (included)	Same	Left & Right (at extra cost)
ASM	No	No	No
Secrets	15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional	Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability	7 secrets types, 3 in common and 4 additional
AI	4 functions, 3 in common and 1 additional	Same	3 functions, all in common
Open-source	MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version	Not applicable	No
Provisioning as Code	Yes	Yes	No
Deployment	SaaS	Same	SaaS and on-premises
Regions	US	Same	AMS, APAC, EMEA and SGP
Status	Yes	Yes	Yes
Incidents	6 per year	Same	9.2 per year

Integrations

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Fortify
SCM	4	Same	4, all in common
Binary repositories	None	None	None
Ticketing	3, 1 in common and 2 additional	Same	5, 1 in common and 4 additional
ChatOps	None	None	1
IDE	3, 2 in common and 1 additional	Same	4, 2 in common and 2 additional
CI/CD	20, 5 in common and 15 additional	Same	6, 5 in common and 1 additional
SCA	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner and 5 integrations
Container	Native scanner	Same	1
SAST	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner
DAST	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner and 1 integration
IAST	None	None	None
Cloud	3, all in common	Same	4, 3 in common and 1 additional
CSPM	Native scanner	Same	None
Secrets	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner
Remediation	None	None	2
Bug bounty	None	None	None
Vulnerability management	None	None	None
Compliance	None	None	None

References were last checked on Aug 28, 2025.

Free trial

Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.

Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Fortify | Fluid Attacks

Fortify