Comparison between Fluid Attacks and GitLab | Fluid Attacks

GitLab Ultimate

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to GitLab Ultimate's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Info
This comparison focuses exclusively on the product itself, even though it belongs to a larger parent company. All information collected is based on the product's technical, functional, and theoretical capabilities, not on attributes of the parent company.
Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
GitLab
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount

Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)

Headcount distribution
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Headcount growth
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Headquarters
CO and US
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Countries
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, EC, MX, PA, PE and US
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Reputation
9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
8.72 from 437 reviews over 9 years on PeerSpot and TrustRadius
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Acquisitions
None
None
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Revenue
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
CVE
276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
1,007 CVEs reported to MITRE by GitLab
Compliance

None

Bug bounty
Visits
21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Authority
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Vulnerability database
GitLab - Third-party
Content
Knowledge base
13 KB sections, 6 in common and 7 additional
8 KB sections, 6 in common and 2 additional
Community
Chat (Discord) and Forum by GitLab
Sync training
No
Async training
5 product use courses by GitLab with certification (subscription-based)
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 377 partners
Marketplaces AWS and GCP
Freemium
No
No
Yes (Application Security Testing not included)
Free trial
Demo
Open Demo
No
No
No
Pricing
Pricing tiers
Minimum term
Minimum payment period
Minimum capabilities
Same plus: API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
Minimum scope
Pricing drivers
Users
Minimum monthly payment
No information available

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
GitLab
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
Response
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
None
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 67 standards
All requirements from the same standards
31 standards, 15 in common and 16 additional
Detection method
Remediation
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
Same, plus 1
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
Outputs
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
Same, plus 2
6, 4 in common and 2 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
GitLab
ASPM
No
API
IDE
functionalities, 3 in common and 1 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
3 functionalities all in common
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources
4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional
2 sources, 1 in common and 1 additional
Threat model alignment
No
Priority criteria
CVSS, EPSS and KEV
Custom prioritization
Scanner origin
In-house and External (Gemnasium for SCA, KICKS for IaC, Semgrep for SAST and Trivy for Containers)
SCA
23 package managers, 15 in common and 8 additional
16 package managers, 15 in common and 1 additional
AI security
No
No
Reachability
12 languages, 4 in common and 8 additional
languages, all in common
Reachability type
SBOM
22 package managers, 13 in common and 9 additional
16 package managers, 13 in common and 3 additional
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
Autofix on components
No
No
Containers
distributions, 3 in common and 1 additional
13 distributions, 3 in common and 10 additional
Source SAST
(languages)
12, 11 in common and 1 additional
17, 11 in common and 6 additional
Source SAST
(frameworks)
22, 3 in common and 19 additional

4, 3 in common and 1 additional

Custom rules
No
No
IaC
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
7, 6 in common and 1 additional
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

9 attack surface types, 6 in common and 3 additional

API security testing
No
4 types of APIs, all in common
6 types of APIs, 4 in common and 2 additional
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 7 in common and 8 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
135 secrets types, 7 in common and 128 additional
AI
3 functions, all in common
4 functions, 3 in common and 1 additional
MCP
Open source
Not applicable
MIT. Partially equivalent to the paid version
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
GitLab
SCM
6, 1 in common and 5 additional
1 in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

9, 2 in common and 7 additional

ChatOps
None
None

3

IDE
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

15, 2 in common and 13 additional

CI/CD
21, 4 in common and 17 additional
4, all in common
SCA

Native powered by Gemnasium and 8 integrations

Container

Native powered by Trivy and 3 integrations

SAST

Native powered by Semgrep and 5 integrations

DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
1
Secrets
Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
None
Compliance
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Nov 21, 2025.


Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.