Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Inspectiv | Fluid Attacks

Inspectiv

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Inspectiv's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Inspectiv
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
Headcount

55

Headcount distribution
Headcount growth
+12%, +25%, +25%
Headquarters
Countries
CO and US
Reputation
9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
No reviews
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
10K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn and X
Research firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$18.7M USD in 3 rounds from 11 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
None
Revenue
5M to 10M
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked among the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance

None

Bug bounty
No
Visits
19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%
29K per month. Top 3: 19% IN, 9% CN, 9% NL and others 63%
Authority
Vulnerability database
None
Content
Knowledge base
None
Community
Forum No
Sync training
No
Async training
No
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces None
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Open Demo
No
No
No
Pricing
Pricing tiers
No information available
Minimum term
Minimum payment period
Minimum capabilities

Same plus: PTaaSRE and SCR

Minimum scope
No information available
Pricing drivers
Minimum monthly payment
No information available

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Inspectiv
PTaaS
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No information available
Secure code review
No
No information available
Pivoting
No
No information available
Exploitation
No
No information available
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
Availability and response
Min availability
≥99.95% per minute LTM
≥ 99.50% per month
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
No
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
No
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
No
Standards
Some requirements from 67 standards, 4 in common and 63 additional
All requirements from the same standards
4  standards, all in common
Detection method
Remediation
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 1
Outputs
Same, plus 2
No information available

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Inspectiv
ASPM
Yes
No
API
Same
Yes. No information available
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
No
CI/CD
Does not break the build
Vulnerability sources
Same
No information available
Priority criteria
Custom prioritization
No
Scanner origin
SCA
No
AI security
No
No
Reachability
No
Reachability type
Not applicable
SBOM
No
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
No
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
No
Source SAST
(languages)
No
Source SAST
(frameworks)

No

Custom rules
No
No
No
IaC
4, all in common
No
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
No
DAST

Yes. No information available

API security testing
No
No
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional
MCP
No
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
No information available
Status
No
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Inspectiv
SCM
None
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

1

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE

None

CI/CD
None
SCA

None

Container

None

SAST

None

DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
None
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Oct 06, 2025.

More like Inspectiv
  1. Invicti
  2. StackHawk
  3. Synacktiv

Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.