Invicti
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Invicti? The following comparison table enables you to discern
the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity
needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Invicti
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
320 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
Frost
& Sullivan and IDC
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
Acquired 1 time
and made 2
acquisitions
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVEs as CNA Researcher
|
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC
2 Type II and SOC
3
|
||
|
Bug bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
|||
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation
sections, 6 in common
and 7 additional
|
7 documentation
sections, 6 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use
courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS and Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (essential,
professional and ultimate). None transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
|||
|
Minimum payment period
|
|||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS,
RE and SCR
|
||
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
5 targets
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
|||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Invicti
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
||
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
Availability and response | ||
|
Min availability
|
>=99.95%
per minute LTM
|
>= 99.5% per
month
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards,
15 in common and 52
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
15 standards,
all in common
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
False positives
|
11.49 times better
|
18.07 times better
|
5% F0.5 score per quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
19.92 times better
|
57.28 times better
|
1% F2.0 score per severity
|
|
Remediation
|
5,
1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
1
in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
3 in common and 2
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
7,
3 in common and 4 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Invicti
|
|
ASPM
|
|||
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same,
plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
|||
|
Custom prioritization
|
|||
|
Scanner origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same,
plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
7 attack
surface types, 4 in common and
3 additional
|
5 attack surface types, 4
in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
API security testing
|
No
|
4 types
of APIs, all in common
|
4 types of
APIs, all in common
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same,
plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions,
1 in common and 2
additional
|
1 function in common | |
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Invicti
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3,
2 in common and 1 additional
|
14, 2 in common and
12 additional
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
3 |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
21, 9
in common and 12 additional
|
9, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
10 | ||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
Native
and 10 integrations
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
Native
and 2 integrations
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
10 | ||
|
Secrets
|
None
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
Native and 1 integration
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Dec 03, 2025.
More like Invicti
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.