Invicti
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Invicti? The following comparison
table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting
your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their
descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Invicti
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information
available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None |
None
|
Acquired 1
time and made 0 acquisitions
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type
II and SOC
3
|
||
|
Bug bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability database
|
|||
|
Content
|
|||
|
Knowledge base
|
13 KB sections, 7
in common and 6 additional
|
7 KB
sections, 6 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use
courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS and Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
|
|
Minimum commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment period
|
|||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
5 targets
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Invicti
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
||
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
Availability and response | ||
|
Min availability
|
>=99.95%
per minute LTM
|
>=
99.5% per
month
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65
standards, 15 in common and
50
additional
|
All requirements from the same
standards
|
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
False positives
|
11.49 times better
|
18.07 times better
|
5% F0.5 score per quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
19.92 times better
|
57.28 times better
|
1% F2.0 score per severity
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
1 in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 2 in common and
3
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
6, 2 in common and 4
additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Invicti
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources,
none in common
|
None
|
|
|
Priority criteria
|
|||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
Same,
plus 4
|
No
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of
binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
7 attack
surface types, 4 in common and 3 additional
|
5 attack surface types, 4 in common and 1 additional |
|
|
API security testing
|
No
|
4 types of
APIs, all in common
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and
secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No | ||
|
MCP
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Invicti
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
6, 2 in common and 4 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 9 in common and 11 additional
|
9, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Remediation
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Sep 18, 2025.
More like Invicti
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.