Legit Security
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Legit Security's? The following comparison table enables you to
discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's
cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions on the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Legit Security
|
|
Focus
|
Native ASPM with in-house scanners
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
94 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
Engineering 42%,
IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 30%, IT 10%, sales 10%, marketing 4% and others 46%
|
|
|
Headcount growth
|
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
-1%, -10%, +21%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO
and US
|
IL and US | |
|
Countries
|
AR,
BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
IL and US | |
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
10 from 28 reviews over 2 year on
Gartner and PeerSpot
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
13K based on the following: LinkedIn,
X and YouTube
|
|
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
Frost & Sullivan and IDC
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2021
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$73.5M USD in 3 rounds from 7 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
5M to 25M
|
|
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC
2 Type II and SOC
3
|
ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II | |
|
Bug bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
27K per month. Top 3: 55% US, 5% IN, 3%
UK. Others 37%
|
|
|
Authority
|
39 out of 100
|
||
| Public vulnerability DB |
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, case studies, customer
testimonial, data sheets, documentation, infographics, reports, videos, webinars and
white papers
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
No information available
|
||
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use
courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
14-day free trial
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and marketplaces
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
|
Minimum term
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Annually | ||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST,
containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
ASPM, SAST, SCA and secrets
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
100 users
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Users
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
5,000 USD
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No information available
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Legit Security
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability
research
|
|
SLA
|
Availability | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95%
per minute LTM
|
>=99.5% per year
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee or freelance
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards,
13 in common and 54
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
18 standards, 13 in common and 5
additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated
tools, AI
and human intelligence
|
Automated tools and AI
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5,
3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
3, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
2 in common and 3
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
2, all in common
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Legit Security
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes
|
||
|
API
|
REST with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same,
plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS, EPSS, KEV and Legit Posture Scope
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
In-house
|
||
|
SCA
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Deterministic
|
||
|
SBOM
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12,
2 in common and 10 additional
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No information available
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
6,
2 in common and 4 additional
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same,
plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets
types, 3 in common and 12
additional
|
Same,
plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
3 secret types, all in common
|
|
AI
|
3 functions,
2 in common and 1
additional
|
5 functions, 2 in common and 3
additional
|
|
|
MCP
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
Apache license 2.0
|
|
|
Provisioning as code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS (no tenancy information)
|
||
| Regions |
US
|
||
|
Status
|
Yes
|
||
|
Incidents
|
0.4 per year
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Legit Security
|
|
SCM
|
6,
4 in common and 2 additional
|
8, 4 in common and 4 additional
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
13
|
|
Ticketing
|
3,
all in common
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
2 |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
21, 8
in common and 13 additional
|
9, 8 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native and 10 integrations
|
||
|
Container
|
14 | ||
|
SAST
|
Native and 11 integrations
|
||
|
DAST
|
None
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3,
all in common
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
CSPM
|
6 | ||
|
Secrets
|
Native and 3 integrations
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information
was legitsecurity.com, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social
media, and other sources.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.