Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Legit Security | Fluid Attacks

Legit Security

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Legit Security's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Legit Security
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount

96

Headcount Distribution
Headcount Growth
Headquarters
Countries
CO and US
Same
IL and US
Reputation
9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
10 from 16 reviews over 1 year on Gartner and PeerSpot
Followers
20K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
13K based on the following: LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$73.5M USD in 3 rounds from 7 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
None
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II
Bug Bounty
No
Visits
19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%
20K per month. Top 3: 28% US, 20% PK, 13% IN and others 39%
Authority
Vulnerability database
None
Content
Same
Knowledge base
No
Community
No
Sync training
No
No
No
Async training
No
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces AWS
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Open Demo
No
No
No
Pricing
Pricing tiers
plan
plan
1 plan
Minimum commit
Minimum payment period
Annually
Minimum capabilities
Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR
Minimum scope
100 users
Pricing drivers
Minimum monthly payment

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Legit Security
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA
Availability
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
>=99.5% per year
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
No
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 13 in common and 52 additional
All requirements from the same standards
18 standards, 13 in common and 5 additional 
Detection method
Remediation
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1
3, all in common
Outputs
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 2
2, all in common

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Legit Security
ASPM
Yes
API
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources
No information available
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSFEPSS and KEV
Same
Custom prioritization
No
Scanner origin
SCA
Yes. No information available
AI security
No
Reachability
Yes. No information available
Reachability type
SBOM
Yes. No information available
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
No
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
No
Source SAST
(languages)
12, 2 in common and 10 additional
Yes. No information available
Source SAST
(frameworks)

No information available

Custom rules
No
No
No
IaC
6, 2 in common and 4 additional
4
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

No

API security testing
No
No
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
3 secret types, all in common
AI
functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
5 functions, 2 in common and 3 additional
MCP
Open-source
Not applicable
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Legit Security
SCM
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
8, 4 in common and 4 additional
Binary repositories
None
None
Ticketing
3, all in common

5, 3 in common and 2 additional

ChatOps
None
None

2

IDE

None

CI/CD
20, 7 in common and 13 additional
9, 7 in common and 2 additional
SCA
Container

14

SAST
DAST

None

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, all in common
CSPM
6
Secrets
Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
None
Compliance
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Sep 18, 2025.

More like Legit Security
  1. Apiiro
  2. Cycode
  3. Xygeni

Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.