Mandiant

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Mandiant's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Mandiant
Focus	Native ASPM with built-in scanners	AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners	Incident response
Extras	None	None	AI security, ASM, managed defense, MDR , research and threat hunting, security validation and threat intelligence
Headcount	128	Same	1,360
Headcount distribution	Engineering 42%, TI 13%, sales 12%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 27%	Same	Engineering 11%, TI 21%, sales 8%, marketing 0%, operations 3% and others 57%
Headcount growth	-2%, -15%, +1%	Same	+1%, +4%, +5%
Headquarters	87% CO	Same	56% US
Countries	CO and US	Same	US
Reputation	9.84 from 109 reviews over 7 years o n Gartner and Clutch	Same	9.23 from 37 reviews over 7 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius
Followers	18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube	Same	335K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms	None	None	Everest Group, Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group and Omdia
Founded	2001	Same	2004
Funding	Bootstrapped	Same	$40M USD in 2 rounds from 4 investors
Acquisitions	None	None	Acquired 1 time and made 2 acquisitions
Revenue	5M to 10M	Same	100M to 500B
CVE	257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide	Same	8 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3	Same	ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, PCI DSS compliance, SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
Bug bounty	Yes	Yes	Yes
Visits	22K per month. Top 3: 30% CO, 12% US, 8% TN and others 50%	Same	48K per month. Top 3: 26% IN, 14% US, 13% DO and others 47%
Authority	31 out of 100	Same	40 out of 100
Vulnerability database	Discovered	Same	None
Content	Blog, documentation, e-books, reports, videos, webinars and white papers	Same	Blog, data sheets, documentation, e-books, podcasts, reports, testimonials, videos, webinars and white papers
Knowledge base	13 KB sections	Same	No information available
Community	Forum	Same	No
Sync training	No	No	18 Live security education courses (subscription-based)
Async training	3 product use courses, all free	Same	9 security education courses (subscription-based and free)
Distribution	Direct or with any of its 14 partners	Same	Direct or with any of its 3 partners
Marketplaces	AWS	Same	Azure and GCP
Freemium	No	No	No
Free trial	21-day free trial	PoV	PoC
Demo	Yes	Yes	Yes
Pricing	Contact sales, marketplace and public web	Contact sales and public web	Contact sales and marketplaces
Pricing tiers	1 plan	1 plan	No information available
Minimum commit	Monthly	Monthly	Annually
Minimum payment period	Monthly	Monthly	Annually
Minimum capabilities	API security testing, ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets	Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR	Incident response
Minimum scope	1 group	1 author	No information available
Pricing drivers	Groups	Authors	No information available
Minimum monthly payment	1.529 USD	1.529 + 429 USD	No information available

Service

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Mandiant
PTaaS	No	Yes	No. MPT
Reverse engineering	No	Yes	No information available
Secure code review	No	Yes	No information availability
Pivoting	No	Yes	Yes
Exploitation	No	Yes	Yes
Manual reattacks	Not applicable	Unlimited reattacks	No information available
Zero-day vulnerabilities	None	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA	Availability	Accuracy, availability and response	Availability
Min availability	>=99.95% per minute LTM	Same	>=99.5% per month
After-sale guarantees	No	Yes	No
Accreditations	CNA and Penetration testing by CREST	Same	CNA, Cyber Security Incident Response by CREST, Intelligence Led Penetration Testing by CREST and Penetration Testing by CREST
Hacker certifications	Not applicable	202 from 59 different types	Pending
Type of contract	Employee	Same	Employee
Endpoint control	Not applicable	Total	No information available
Channel control	Not applicable	Total	No information available
Standards	Some requirements from 65 standards, 3 in common and 62 additional	All requirements from the same standards	3 standards, all in common
Detection method	Automated tools	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
Remediation	5, 1 in common and 4 additional	Same, plus 1	1 in common
Outputs	5	Same, plus 2	No information available

Product

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Mandiant
ASPM	Yes	Yes	No
API	GraphQL with JSON	Same	REST with JSON
IDE	5 functionalities	Same, plus 1 functionality	No
CLI	Yes	Yes	Yes
CI/CD	Breaks the build	Same	Does not break the build
Vulnerability sources	14 sources, 1 in common and 13 additional	Same	1 source in common
Priority criteria	CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV	Same	CVSS v3.0, EPSS, KEV and MVE (Mandiant Vulnerability Enumeration)
Custom prioritization	Customizable priority score	Same	No
Scanner origin	In-house	In-house	In-house
SCA	24 package managers	Same	No
SCA (AI models)	No	No	No
Reachability	12 languages	Same	No
Reachability type	Deterministic	Same	No
SBOM	22 package managers	Same	No
Malware detection	Yes	Yes	No
Autofix on components	No	No	No
Containers	4 distributions	Same	No
Source SAST (languages)	12	Same	No
Source SAST (frameworks)	22	Same	No
Custom rules	No	No	No
IaC	6	4	No
Binary SAST	1 type of binary	Same, plus 2 types of binaries	No
DAST	7 attack surface types	Same	No
API security testing	No	4 types of APIs	No
IAST	No	No	No
CSPM	Yes	Yes	No
Environments	Left & Right (included)	Same	Right only
ASM	No	No	Yes
Secrets	15 secrets types	Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability	No
AI	4 functions, none in common	Same	1 function
Open-source	MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version	Not applicable	No
Provisioning as Code	Yes	Yes	No
Deployment	SaaS	Same	SaaS and on-premises
Regions	US	Same	AS, EU and US
Status	Yes	Yes	Yes
Incidents	6 per year	Same	No incidents

Integrations

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Mandiant
SCM	4	Same	None
Binary repositories	None	None	None
Ticketing	3, 1 in common and 2 additional	Same	1 in common
ChatOps	None	None	2
IDE	3	Same	None
CI/CD	20	Same	None
SCA	Native	Same	None
Container	Native	Same	None
SAST	Native	Same	None
DAST	Native	Same	None
IAST	None	None	None
Cloud	3	Same	3
CSPM	Native	Same	1
Secrets	Native	Same	None
Remediation	None	None	None
Bug bounty	None	None	None
Vulnerability management	None	None	2
Compliance	None	None	None

References were last checked on Jun 13, 2025.

Free trial

Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.

Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Mandiant | Fluid Attacks

Mandiant