Mend
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Mend's? The following comparison table
enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your
company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their
descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Mend
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$121.2M
USD
in 5 rounds from 8 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
Acquired 0 times and
made 3
acquisitions
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
150 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
||
|
Compliance
|
|||
|
Bug bounty
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
|||
|
Knowledge base
|
13 KB sections, 6
in common and 7 additional
|
6 KB sections, all in common
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use
courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS and Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan |
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
|
Minimum commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment period
|
|||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Mend
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous
zero-day vulnerability
research
|
Continuous
zero-day vulnerability
research
|
|
SLA
|
Availability and support | ||
|
Min availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
>= 99.5% per year
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
|||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65
standards, 8 in common and
57
additional
|
All requirements from
the same
standards
|
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 4 in common and 1
additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
4,
all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
4 in common and
1
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
9, 4 in common and 5
additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Mend
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus
1 functionality
|
||
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional
|
2 sources, 1 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Priority criteria
|
|||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
|||
|
AI security
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages,
3 in common and 9
additional
|
|
|
| Reachability type | |||
|
SBOM
|
10 package managers, 8 in common and 2 additional | ||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Containers
|
4 distributions, all in common
|
14 distributions,
4 in common and 10 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
12,
11 in common and 1 additional
|
26 languages,
11 in common and 15 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
22, 1 in common and 21
additional
|
2, 1 in common and 1
additional
|
|
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IaC
|
6, 3 in common and 3 additional |
4, 1 in common and 3 additional
|
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary,
none in common
|
Same,
plus 2 types of binaries
|
4 types of binaries,
none in common
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Environments
|
Left & Right (included)
|
Same
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
||
|
AI
|
1 function in common | ||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Mend
|
|
SCM
|
4, all in common
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in
common and 2 additional
|
1 in common |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
2, all in
common
|
7, 2 in common and 5 additional |
|
|
CI/CD
|
20, 9 in common and 11
additional
|
9, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native and 1 integration |
||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
Native and 1 integration |
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None |
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None | |
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Aug 28, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.