Oversecured
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Oversecured's? The following comparison table enables you to
discern the
performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To
better understand each attribute, read their
descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Oversecured
|
|
Focus
|
DAST and SAST for mobile applications
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
15 | ||
| Headcount distribution |
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 13%, IT 20%, sales 13%,
marketing 13% operations 7% and others 34%
|
|
| Headcount growth |
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
+25%, +25%, -17%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO
and US
|
US
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR,
BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
UA, US and NL
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
4K based on the following: LinkedIn, X
and YouTube
|
|
| Research firms |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2020
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
1M to 5M
|
|
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
None | |
| Bug bounty |
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
6K per month. Top 3: 67% CN, 10% US, 7%
IN. Others 16%
|
|
|
Authority
|
25 out of 100
|
||
| Public vulnerability DB |
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
No
|
||
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use
courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
PoC
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
| Open demo |
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and public web
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (single scan, integrations).
None transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
No information available
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
No information available
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST,
containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
DAST and SAST for mobile applications
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
No information available
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
No information available
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No information available
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Oversecured
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee or freelance
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 3 in common and 64 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
3 standards, all in common
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
1 in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
1 in common
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Oversecured
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
REST with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
No information available
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
No
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12, 3 in common and 9 additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
| Provisioning as code |
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS (no tenancy information)
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Oversecured
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
1 |
|
IDE
|
3, none in common
|
1
|
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 3 in common and 18 additional
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
None
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
Native
|
||
|
DAST
|
Native
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
| Bug bounty |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 27, 2025. The primary sources of information
was oversecured.com, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social
media, and
other sources.
More like Oversecured
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.