OX Security
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to OX Security's? The following comparison table enables you to
discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's
cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their
descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
OX
|
|
Focus
|
Native ASPM with in-house scanners
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
186 | ||
| Headcount distribution |
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 25%, IT 12%, sales 18%,
marketing 4%, operations 5% and others 36%
|
|
| Headcount growth |
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
+7%, +19%, +88%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO
and US
|
IL and US
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR,
BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
IL, PL and US
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
9.47 from 72 reviews over 2 years on
Capterra, G2 and Gartner
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
45K based on the following: Instagram,
LinkedIn, X and YouTube
|
|
| Research firms |
None
|
None
|
Frost & Sullivan, IDC and Omdia
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2021
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$94M USD in 4 rounds from 9 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M
to 15M
|
1M to 38M
|
|
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
SOC 2 Type II | |
| Bug bounty |
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
22K
per month. Top 3: 23% IN, 22% CO, 15% UK. Others 40%
|
33K per month. Top 3: 18% IL, 17% US,
11% PL and others 54%
|
|
|
Authority
|
37 out of 100
|
||
| Public vulnerability DB |
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, case studies, data sheets,
documentation, events, podcast, reports, videos, webinars and white papers
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 5 in common and 8 additional
|
6 documentation sections, 5 in common
and 1 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use
courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its 58 partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS and Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
PoV
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
| Open demo |
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales, marketplaces and public
web
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
4 plans (Startup, professional, scale
and enterprise). First 2 transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST,
containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
SAST, SCA and secrets
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
1 developer
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Developers
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
19 USD
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No
|
||
|
Free support
|
No
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
OX
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
Support | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee or freelance
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 9 in common and 58 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
9 standards, all in common
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
4, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
OX
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes
|
||
|
API
|
GraphQL with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS, EPSS and KEV
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 14 in common and 9 additional
|
17 package managers, 14 in common and 3
additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages, 7 in common and 5 additional
|
7 languages, all in common
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Deterministic
|
||
|
SBOM
|
22 package managers, 10 in common and 12 additional
|
17 package managers, 10 in common and 7
additional
|
|
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12, all in common
|
15, 12 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, all in common
|
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
Yes
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
5 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
MCP
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
| Provisioning as code |
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy information)
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
OX
|
|
SCM
|
6, all in common
|
6, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, all in common
|
7, 3 in common and 4 additional
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
2 |
|
IDE
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 8 in common and 13 additional
|
10, 8 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native and 18 integrations
|
||
|
Container
|
Native and 18 integrations | ||
|
SAST
|
Native and 15 integrations
|
||
|
DAST
|
Native and 5 integrations
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
CSPM
|
9 | ||
|
Secrets
|
Native and 8 integrations
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
| Bug bounty |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 27, 2025. The primary sources of information
were ox.security and docs.ox.security, which were supplemented by specialized
information-gathering sites, social media, and
other sources.
More like OX
Security
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.