Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Phoenix Security | Fluid Attacks

Phoenix Security

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Phoenix's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Phoenix
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount

20

Headcount distribution
Headcount growth
Headquarters
Countries
CO and US
UK and US
Reputation
9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.63 from 113 reviews over 3 years on Capterra, G2 and Gartner
Followers
20K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
60K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$1.79M USD in 6 round from 7 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
None
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II
Bug bounty
No
Visits
19K per month. Top 350% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%
4K per month. Top 3: 22% US, 12% KR, 10% IN and others 56%
Authority
Vulnerability database
None
Content
Same
Knowledge base
13 KB sections, 3 in common and 10 additional
KB sections, 3 in common and 1 additional
Community
Sync training
No
No
No
Async training
No
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces None
Freemium
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing tiers
plan
plan
2 plans (professional, enterprise). First transparent
Minimum commit
Minimum payment period
Minimum capabilities
Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR
Minimum scope
1.001 assets
Pricing drivers
Groups
Minimum monthly payment

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Phoenix
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
Response
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
No
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
No
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 8 in common and 57 additional
All requirements from the same standards
standards, all in common
Detection method
None
Remediation
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1
2, all in common
Outputs
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 2
2, 1 in common and 1 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Phoenix
ASPM
Yes
API
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
No
CI/CD
Does not break the build
Vulnerability sources
No information available
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSFEPSS and KEV
Same
Custom prioritization
No
Scanner origin
None
SCA
No
AI security
No
No
Reachability
Yes. No information available
Reachability type
SBOM
No
Malware Detection
Yes
Yes
No
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
No
Source SAST (frameworks)

No

Custom rules
No
No
No
IaC
6
4
No
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

No

API security testing
No
No
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
Environments
Left & Right (included)
Same
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
functions, none in common
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
No information available
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Phoenix
SCM
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
3, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

4, 2 in common and 2 additional

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE

None

CI/CD
None
SCA
Container

19

SAST

19

DAST

9

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, all in common
CSPM
7
Secrets

None

Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Aug 29, 2025.

More like Phoenix Security
  1. Archipelo
  2. Kondukto
  3. Opus Security

Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.