RunSybil

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to RunSybil's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	RunSybil
Focus	Native ASPM with In-house scanners	AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners	AI-driven pentesting
Extras	None	None	None
Headcount	136	Same	8
Headcount Distribution	Engineering 40%, IT 15%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%	Same	Engineering 50%, IT 13%, operations 13% and others 24%
Headcount Growth	+3%, -2%, -7%	Same	+60%, +60%, 0%
Headquarters	86% CO	Same	100% US
Countries	CO and US	Same	US
Reputation	9.79 from 161 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch	Same	No reviews
Followers	20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube	Same	2K based on the following: LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms	None	None	IDC
Founded	2001	Same	2023
Funding	Bootstrapped	Same	No information available
Acquisitions	None	None	None
Revenue	5M to 10M	Same	No information available
CVE	257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide	Same	0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3	Same	None
Bug Bounty	Yes	Yes	No
Visits	19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%	Same	1K per month. Top 3: 83% IN, 10% US, 4% AT and others 3%
Authority	32 out of 100	Same	18 out of 100
Vulnerability database	Discovered and third-party	Same	None
Content	Blog, documentation, e-books, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers	Same	Blog
Knowledge base	13 KB sections	Same	No
Community	Forum	Same	No
Sync training	1 workshop	Same	No
Async training	3 product use courses, all free	Same	No
Distribution	Direct or with any of its 14 partners	Same	Direct
Marketplaces	AWS	Same	None
Freemium	No	No	No
Free trial	21-day free trial	PoV	PoV
Demo	Yes	Yes	Yes
Open Demo	No	No	No
Pricing	Contact sales, marketplace and public web	Contact sales and public web	Contact sales
Pricing tiers	1 plan	1 plan	No information available
Minimum term	Monthly	Monthly	No information available
Minimum payment period	Monthly	Monthly	No information available
Minimum capabilities	API security Testing, ASPM, Binary SAST, Containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets	Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR	No information available
Minimum scope	1 group	1 author	No information available
Pricing drivers	Groups	Authors	No information available
Minimum monthly payment	1,529 USD	1,529 + 429 USD	No information available

Service

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	RunSybil
PTaaS	No	Yes	Yes. Automated AI-PTaaS
Reverse engineering	No	Yes	No
Secure code review	No	Yes	No
Pivoting	No	Yes	No
Exploitation	No	Yes	Yes
Manual reattacks	Not applicable	Unlimited reattacks	Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities	None	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research	None
SLA	Availability	Accuracy, availability and response	No
Min availability	>=99.95% per minute LTM	Same	None
After-sale guarantees	No	Yes	No
Accreditations	CNA and Penetration testing by CREST	Same	None
Hacker certifications	Not applicable	202 from 59 different types	Not applicable
Type of contract	Employee	Same	Employee
Endpoint control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Channel control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Standards	Some requirements from 67 standards	All requirements from the same standards	No information available
Detection method	Automated tools	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence	Automated tools and AI
Remediation	5, none in common	Same, plus 1	1
Outputs	5, 1 in common and 4 additional	Same, plus 2	1 in common

Product

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	RunSybil
ASPM	Yes	Yes	No
API	GraphQL with JSON	Same	No
IDE	5 functionalities	Same, plus 1 functionality	No
CLI	Yes	Yes	No
CI/CD	Breaks the build	Same	Does not break the build
Vulnerability sources	4 sources	Same	No information available
Threat model alignment	Yes	Yes	No
Priority criteria	CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV	Same	No information available
Custom prioritization	Priority score	Same	No information available
Scanner origin	In-house	In-house	In-house
SCA	23 package managers	Same	No
AI security	No	Yes	No
Reachability	12 languages	Same	No
Reachability type	Deterministic	Same	Not applicable
SBOM	22 package managers	Same	No
Malware detection	Yes	Yes	No
Autofix on components	No	No	No
Containers	4 distributions	Same	No
Source SAST (languages)	12	Same	No
Source SAST (frameworks)	22	Same	No
Custom rules	No	No	No
IaC	6	4	No
Binary SAST	1 type of binary	Same, plus 2 types of binaries	No
DAST	7 attack surface types	Same	No
API security testing	No	4 types of APIs	No
IAST	No	No	No
CSPM	Yes	Yes	No
ASM	No	No	No
Secrets	15 secrets types	Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability	No
AI	3 functions, none in common	Same	1 function
MCP	Yes	Yes	No
Open-source	MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version	Not applicable	No
Provisioning as Code	Yes	Yes	No
Deployment	SaaS	Same	SaaS
Regions	US	Same	No information available
Status	Yes	Yes	No
Incidents	4 per year	Same	No information available

Integrations

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	RunSybil
SCM	6	Same	None
Binary repositories	None	None	None
Ticketing	3, 1 in common and 2 additional	Same	1 in common
ChatOps	None	None	1
IDE	3	Same	None
CI/CD	21	Same	None
SCA	Native	Same	None
Container	Native	Same	None
SAST	Native	Same	None
DAST	Native	Same	None
IAST	None	None	None
Cloud	3	Same	None
CSPM	Native	Same	None
Secrets	Native	Same	None
Remediation	None	None	None
Bug bounty	None	None	None
Vulnerability management	None	None	None
Compliance	None	None	1

References were last checked on Oct 24, 2025.

More like RunSybil

Mindgard

Free trial

Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.

Comparison between Fluid Attacks and RunSybil | Fluid Attacks

RunSybil