Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Seemplicity | Fluid Attacks

Seemplicity

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Seemplicity's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Seemplicity
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners
Vulnerability management
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount
89
Headcount distribution
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
Engineering 28%, IT 8%, sales 20%, marketing 8%, operations 2% and others 34%
Headcount growth
+8%, +10%, -8%
+11%, +13%, +35%
Headquarters
CO and US
IL
Countries
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US
IL and US
Reputation
9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.87 from 10 reviews over 2 years on Gartner
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
7K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
IDC
Founded
2001
2020
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$82M USD in 3 rounds from 7 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
None
Revenue
10M to 15M
1M to 5M
CVEs as CNA Researcher
276 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher
Compliance
None
Bug bounty
No
Visits
21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
3K per month. Top 3: 64% US, 21% ES, 6% IL. Others 9%
Authority
26 out of 100
Public vulnerability DB
Discovered and third-party
None
Content
Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers
Same
Blog, case studies, customer profiles, data sheets, e-books, glossary, guides, reports, tutorials, videos, webinars and white papers
Comprehensive documentation
No
Community
No
Sync training
No
Async training
No
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces AWS and Azure
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
PoC
Demo
Yes
Open demo
No
No
No
Pricing
Contact sales and marketplaces
Pricing tiers
1 plan
Minimum term
Annually
Minimum payment period
Annually
Minimum capabilities
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets
Same plus: API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
Vulnerability management
Minimum scope
No information available
Pricing drivers
No information available
Free implementation
Yes
Free support
No

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Seemplicity
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
Availability and response
Minimum availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
No information available
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
No
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Employee
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 67 standards
All requirements from the same standards
No information available
Detection method
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
None
Remediation
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1
2, all in common
Outputs
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 2
2, all in common

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Seemplicity
ASPM
Yes
API
GraphQL with JSON
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
No
CI/CD
Does not break the build
Vulnerability sources
None
Threat model alignment
No
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV
CVSS v3.0, EPSS and KEV
Custom prioritization
Risk score
Scanner origin
None
SCA
No
AI security
No
No
Reachability
No
Reachability type
Not applicable
SBOM
No
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
No
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
No
Source SAST
(languages)
No
Source SAST
(frameworks)
No
Custom rules
No
No
Yes
IaC
6
4
No
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST
No
API security testing
No
No
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
MCP
No
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as code
No
Deployment
SaaS (no tenancy information)
Regions
No information available
Status
No
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Seemplicity
SCM
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
3, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
10, 2 in common and 8 additional
ChatOps
None
None
2
IDE
3
None
CI/CD
None
SCA
9
Container
15
SAST
11
DAST
19
IAST
None
None
1
Cloud
3, none in common
6
CSPM
7
Secrets
4
Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
2
Vulnerability management
None
None
4
Compliance
None
None
1

Notes
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary source of information was seemplicity.io, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.

More like Seemplicity
  1. DefectDojo
  2. PlexTrac

Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.