Semgrep
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Semgrep's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Semgrep
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$193M USD in 4 rounds from 7 investors
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
None
|
||
|
Compliance
|
|||
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS and GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Semgrep
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
Response | ||
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 2 in common and 63 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
False positives
|
3.51 times better
|
6.09 times better
|
13% F0.5 score involving quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
0.80 times better
|
14.50 times better
|
6% F2.0 score involving severity
|
|
Remediation
|
|||
|
Outputs
|
|
Same, plus 2 formats
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Semgrep
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
Same, plus 1 IDE functionality
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Reachability
|
|
||
|
SBOM
|
|||
|
Containers
|
None
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
22 languages, 13 in common and 9 additional
|
||
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
3 frameworks, all in common |
||
|
Binary SAST
|
None
|
||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus other obtained manually
|
||
|
AI
|
|||
|
Fast and automatic
|
|||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Semgrep
|
|
SCM integrations
|
|||
|
Binary repositories integrations
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing integrations
|
1 integration in common |
||
|
ChatOps integrations
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE integrations
|
13 integrations, 2 in common and 11 additional |
||
|
CI/CD integrations
|
|
||
|
SCA integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
Container integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
None |
|
|
SAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
DAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
None |
|
|
IAST integrations
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud integrations
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
None | |
|
Secrets integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
Compliance integrations
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Feb 17, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.