Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Semgrep | Fluid Attacks

Semgrep

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Semgrep's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Semgrep 
Focus
AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Employees

165

Reputation
Maximum of 9.69 based on 41 reviews over 6 years from: Clutch and Gartner Peer Insights.
Same
Maximum of 9.28 based on 36 reviews over 2 years from: G2Gartner Peer Insights and PeerSpot.
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
15K based on the following: FacebookLinkedInX and YouTube
Research Firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$93M USD in 3 rounds from 2 investors
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide.
None
Compliance
Documentation
Visits
35K per monthTop 3: 48% US, 15% FR, 7% CO and others 30%
45K per month. Top 3: 43% IN, 19% FR, 7% CA and others 31%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces AWS and GitHub
Freemium
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Semgrep
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
Chains vulnerabilities to reveal new, higher-impact ones.
No
Exploitation
No
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
No
SLA
Response
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 2 in common and 63 additional.
All requirements from the same standards
standards, all in common.
Detection method
False positives
4.50 times better
7.09 times better
13% F0.5 score per quantity
False negatives
6.71 time better
19.31 times better
4% F2.0 score per severity
Remediation
4 remediation options, all in common.
Same, plus 1 remediation option.
remediation options, all in common.
Outputs
5 formats, 3 in common and 2 additional.
Same, plus 2 formats.
formats, 3 in common and 2 additional.

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Semgrep
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
functionalities, all in common.
functionalities, all in common.
CLI
CI/CD
SCA
19 package managers, 14 in common and 5 additional.
18 package managers, 14 in common and 4 additional.
Reachability
languages, all in common.
10 languages, 5 in common and 5 additional.
SBOM
19 package managers, 14 in common and 5 additional.
18 package managers, 14 in common and 4 additional.
Containers
distributions, 3 in common and 1 additional.
No
Source SAST (languages)
24 languages, 10 in common and 14 additional.
Same, plus others
17 languages, 10 in common and 7 additional.
Source SAST (frameworks)
20 frameworks, 3 in common and 17 additional.
Same, plus others

frameworks, all in common.

Binary SAST
1 type of binary.
No
DAST
attack surfaces, 3 in common and 2 additional.

No

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 10 in common and 15 additional.
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability.
15 secrets types, 10 in common and 5 additional.
AI
3 functions, all in common.
functions, all in common.
Fast and automatic
Open source
Not applicable
GNU LGPL 2.1 license. Partially equivalent to the paid version.
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Semgrep
SCM integrations
integrations, all in common.
integrations, all in common.
Binary repositories integrations
None
None
None
Ticketing integrations
integrations, 1 in common and 2 additional.

integration in common.

ChatOps integrations
None
None

integration.

IDE integrations
integrations, all in common.

14 integrations, 2 in common and 12 additional.

CI/CD integrations
23 integrations, 6 in common and 17 additional.
integrations, 6 in common and 1 additional.
SCA integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

Container integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

No

SAST integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

DAST integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

None

IAST integrations
None
None
None
Cloud Integrations
integrations, all in common.
None
CSPM integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
None
Secrets integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

Compliance integrations
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Dec 19, 2024.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.