Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Semgrep | Fluid Attacks

Semgrep

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Semgrep's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Semgrep 
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount

204

Headcount distribution
Headcount growth
Headquarters
Countries
 CO and US
Reputation
9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.06 from 40 reviews over 3 years on G2Gartner and PeerSpot
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
22K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$193M USD in 4 rounds from 8 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
None
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
Bug bounty
No
Visits
26K per month. Top 3: 27% CO, 18% US, 6% PE and others 49%
55K per month. Top 3: 20% US, 13% IN, 6% JP and others 61%
Authority
Vulnerability database
None
Content
Knowledge base
13 KB sections, 8 in common and 5 additional
10 KB sections, 8 in common and 2 additional
Community
Sync training
No
No
No
Async training
11 security education courses (suscription-based)
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces AWS and GitHub
Freemium
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing tiers
2 plans (teams and enterprise). First transparent
Minimum commit
Minimum payment period
Monthly
Minimum capabilities
Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR
Minimum scope
1 group
Pricing drivers
Minimum monthly payment

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Semgrep
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
Response
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
No information available
After-sale guarantees
No
No
No
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 2 in common and 63 additional
All requirements from the same standards
2 standards, all in common
Detection method
False positives
4.5 times better
7.09 times better
13% F0.5 score per quantity
False negatives
6.72 times better
19.32 times better
4% F2.0 score per severity
Remediation
5
Same, plus 1
5, all in common
Outputs
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 2
5, 3 in common and 2 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Semgrep
ASPM
Yes
No
API
IDE
functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources
4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional
1 source in common
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV
Same
Custom prioritization
No
Scanner origin
SCA
24 package managers, 14 in common and 10 additional
17 package managers, 14 in common and 3 additional
AI security
No
No
Reachability
12 languages , 10 in common and 2 additional
10 languages, all in common
Reachability type
SBOM
22 package managers, 14 in common and 8 additional
17 package managers, 14 in common and 3 additional
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
Autofix on components
No
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
12, all in common
18, 12 in common and 6 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)
22, 6 in common and 16 additional

7, 6 in common and 1 additional

Custom rules
No
No
IaC
6, 1 in common and 5 additional
4
1 in common
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

No

API security testing
No
No
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Environments
Left & Right (included)
Same
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 10 in common and 15 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
15 secrets types, 10 in common and 5 additional
AI
4 functions, 2 in common and 2 additional
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
Open-source
Not applicable
GNU LGPL 2.1 license, partially equivalent to the paid version
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Semgrep
SCM
4 
4, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing

1 in common

ChatOps
None
None

None

IDE

14, 2 in common and 12 additional

CI/CD
20, 6 in common and 14 additional
7, 6 in common and 1 additional
SCA
Container

None

SAST
DAST

None

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets
Remediation
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
None
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Aug 29, 2025.
More like Semgrep
  1. DeepSource
  2. Mend
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.