Semgrep
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Semgrep's? The following comparison table enables you to discern
the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity
needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Semgrep
|
|
Focus
|
In-house scanners
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
224 | ||
| Headcount distribution |
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 32%, IT 8%, sales 19%,
marketing 8%, operations 3% and others 30%
|
|
| Headcount growth |
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
+18%, +35%, +52%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
US
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
US
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
8.96 from 69 reviews over 3 years on
G2, Gartner and PeerSpot
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
22K based on the following: Facebook,
LinkedIn, X and YouTube
|
|
| Research firms |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2017
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$193M USD in 4 rounds from 8 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
1M to 50M
|
|
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
SOC 2 Type II
|
|
| Bug bounty |
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
71K per month. Top 3: 32% US, 12% IN,
6% RU. Others 50%
|
|
|
Authority
|
34 out of 100
|
||
| Public vulnerability DB |
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, case studies, documentation,
events and videos
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 8 in common
and 5 additional
|
10 documentation sections, 8 in common
and 2 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
Chat (Slack)
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
11 security education courses
(subscription-based)
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS and GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Free trial
|
30-day free trial and PoC
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
| Open demo |
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales, marketplaces and public
web
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (teams and enterprise). First
transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
SAST
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
11 developers
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Developers
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
440 USD
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Semgrep
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
Response | ||
|
Min availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 2 in common and 65
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
2 standards, all in common
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools and AI
|
|
|
False positives
|
4.5 times better
|
7.09 times better
|
13% F0.5 score per quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
6.72 times better
|
19.32 times better
|
4% F2.0 score per severity
|
|
Remediation
|
5, all in common
|
Same, plus 1
|
5, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 3 in common and 2
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Semgrep
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
REST with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1
additional
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1
additional
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional
|
1 source in common
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS and EPSS
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
In-house
|
||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 14 in common and 9
additional
|
17 package managers, 14 in common and 3
additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
No | |
|
Reachability
|
12 languages, 10 in common and 2
additional
|
10 languages, all in common
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Deterministic
|
||
|
SBOM
|
22 package managers, 14 in common and 8
additional
|
17 package managers, 14 in common and 3
additional
|
|
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12, all in common
|
18, 12 in common and 6 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
22, 6 in common and 16 additional
|
7, 6 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
IaC
|
6, 1 in common and 5 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
| IAST |
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets types, 10 in common and 15
additional
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
15 secrets types, 10 in common and 5
additional
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
|
|
MCP
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
GNU LGPL 2.1 license, partially
equivalent to the paid version
|
|
| Provisioning as code | No | ||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy
information)
|
||
| Regions |
US
|
||
|
Status
|
Yes
|
||
|
Incidents
|
5.08 per year
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Semgrep
|
|
SCM
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
14, 2 in common and 12 additional
|
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 7 in common and 14 additional
|
7, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
Native
|
||
|
DAST
|
None
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
Native
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
1
|
| Bug bounty |
None
|
None
|
1
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 11, 2025. The primary source of information was
semgrep.dev, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and
other sources.
More like Semgrep
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.