Comparison between Fluid Attacks and SOOS | Fluid Attacks

SOOS

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to SOOS's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
SOOS
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Employees

24

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.59 from 40 reviews over 3 years on G2
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
1K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$6M USD in 2 rounds from 1 investor
Revenue
1B to 10B
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
None
Compliance
SOC 2 Type II
Documentation
Visits
26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%
15K per month. Top 3: 35% US, 16% IN, 11% TW and others 38%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces Azure
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
SOOS
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
No information available
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 8 in common and 57 additional
All requirements from the same standards
8 standards, all in common
Detection
Remediation
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1
2, all in common
Outputs
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 2
4, 2 in common and 2 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
SOOS
ASPM
Yes
IDE
functionalities, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
2 functionalities, 1 in common and 1 additional
CLI
CI/CD
SCA
24 package managers, 12 in common and 11 additional
15 package managers, 12 in common and 3 additional
Reachability
No
SBOM
Yes. No information available
Containers
Yes. No information available
Source SAST (languages)
18, 10 in common and 8 additional
Same, plus 4
13, 10 in common and 3 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)
22, 2 in common and 20 additional

3, 2 in common and 1 additional

Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST
10 attack surface types, 4 in common and 6 additional

6 attack surface types, 4 in common and 2 additional

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
Yes. No information available
AI
No
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
No information available
Status
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
SOOS
SCM
4, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

4, 2 in common and 2 additional

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE
2, 1 in common and 1 additional

1 in common

CI/CD
20, 10 in common and 10 additional
11, 10 in common and 1 additional
SCA
Container

Native scanner

SAST
DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets
Compliance
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.