Strike
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Strike's? The following comparison table enables you to discern
the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity
needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Strike
|
|
Focus
|
External DAST and PTaaS
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
84 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$19.4M USD in 3 rounds from 15
investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
None | |
|
Bug bounty
|
No | ||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
| Public vulnerability DB |
None
|
||
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 4 in common and 9 additional
|
No
|
|
|
Community
|
No | ||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
Free trial and PoV
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (Strike scanner, Premium
pentesting). None transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
|||
|
Minimum payment period
|
|||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
6 targets
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
|||
|
Free support
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Strike
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
||
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No information available | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
||
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
||
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
No information available
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day
vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Min availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 6 in common and 61 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
6 standards, all in common
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, none in common
|
Same, plus 1
|
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 4 in common and 1
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Strike
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
|||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
External (Invicti for DAST)
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
7 attack surface types, 4 in common and
3 additional
|
5 attack surface types, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
API security testing
|
No
|
4 types of APIs, all in common
|
4 types of APIs, all in common
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, none in common
|
1 function
|
|
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Strike
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
1 |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
None
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
None
|
||
|
DAST
|
Native powered by Invicti
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Dec 01, 2025.
More like Strike
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.