Wiz
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Wiz's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the
performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To
better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Wiz
|
|
Focus
|
Cloud Native Application Product
Platform (CNAPP)
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
CIEM, CDR, CSPM, CWPP, DSPM and IaC
|
|
Headcount
|
3,123 | ||
| Headcount distribution |
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 19%, IT 9%, sales 22%,
marketing 3%, operations 5% and others 42%
|
|
| Headcount growth |
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
+15%, +57%, +218%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
IL and US | |
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
IL and US
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
9.17 from 1,090 reviews over 4 years on
G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
390K based on the following: Facebook,
Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
|
|
| Research firms |
None
|
None
|
Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, IDC
and Omdia
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2020
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$2B USD in 8 rounds from 20 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
Acquired 1 time and made 3 acquisitions
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
100M to 1B
|
|
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
5 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
CSA STAR Level 1, FedRAMP Authorized, ISO/IEC27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, PCI DSS,SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, StateRAMP Authorized and TX-RAMP | |
| Bug bounty |
Yes
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
544K per month. Top 3: 32% US, 14% IN,
7% UK. Others 47%
|
|
|
Authority
|
51 out of 100
|
||
| Public vulnerability DB |
Discovered and third-party
|
Third-party
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, customer stories, CloudSec
academy, documentation, guides, podcast, reports, webinars and white papers
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
No
|
||
|
Community
|
Private platform
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
1 product use course
(subscription-based)
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure and GCP | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
14-day free trial
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
| Open demo |
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and marketplaces
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (essential, advanced). All
transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Annually | ||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
CNAPP
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
100 cloud workloads
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Workloads
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
2,000 USD
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No information available
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Wiz
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability
research
|
|
SLA
|
Availability and support | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
>=99.9% per month
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Accreditations
|
AWS Built-in Competency, Cloud Operations Software Competency, Education ISV Competency, Financial Services Technology Competency, Government ISV Competency, Healthcare ISV Competency and Security ISV Competency | ||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee or freelance
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 12 in common and 55
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
21 standards, 12 in common and 9
additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools and AI
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
4, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 3 in common and 2
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Wiz
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes
|
||
|
API
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3
additional
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
3 functionalities, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS, EPSS and KEV
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
In-house | ||
|
SCA
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
Custom rules for workloads
|
|
IaC
|
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
|
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
No
|
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
Yes
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets types, 5 in common and 10
additional
|
Same, plus other obtained manually
|
8 secret types, 5 in common and 3
additional
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
2 functions, all in common
|
|
|
MCP
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
| Provisioning as code |
Yes
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy
information)
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
Yes
|
||
|
Incidents
|
6.3 per year
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Wiz
|
|
SCM
|
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
4
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
4 |
|
IDE
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 10 in common and 11 additional
|
14, 10 in common and 4 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native and 1 integration
|
||
|
Container
|
1 | ||
|
SAST
|
Native and 2 integrations
|
||
|
DAST
|
1
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
1
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
CSPM
|
Native and 5 integrations | ||
|
Secrets
|
Native and 3 integrations
|
||
| Remediation |
None
|
None
|
None
|
| Bug bounty |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
Native and 8 integrations
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
11
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Jan 02, 2026. The primary source of information was
wiz.io, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and
other sources.
More like Wiz
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.