Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Xygeni | Fluid Attacks

Xygeni

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Xygeni's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Xygeni
Focus
AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
Extras
None
None
Employees

25

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on: Gartner and Clutch
Same
10 from 6 reviews over 6 months on: G2PeerSpot and Software Advice
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
4K based on the following: LinkedIn and X
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$4.32M USD in 1 round from 1 investors
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
None
Compliance

None

Documentation
Visits
27K per month. Top 351% BR, 8% IN, 7% CO and others 34%
7K per month. Top 3: 49% CM, 14% BJ, 14% CN and others 23%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Marketplaces GitHub
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Xygeni
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
No information available
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 8 in common and 57 additional
All requirements from the same standards
11 standards, 8 in common and 3 additional
Detection
Remediation
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 1
2, 1 in common and 1 additional
Outputs
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 2
5, 2 in common and 3 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Xygeni
ASPM
Yes
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
CI/CD
SCA
24 package managers, 11 in common and 12 additional
12 package managers, 11 in common and 1 additional
Reachability
Yes. No information available
SBOM
22 package managers, 9 in common and 13 additional
12 package managers, 9 in common and 3 additional
Containers
Yes. No information available
Source SAST (languages)
Same, plus 4
Yes. No information available
Source SAST (frameworks)
No information available
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

No

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
Yes. No information available
AI
No
Open source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
No information available
Status
No
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Xygeni
SCM
4, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

2, all in common

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE

None

CI/CD
20, 7 in common and 13 additional
7, all in common
SCA
Container

Native scanner

SAST
DAST

None

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, all in common
CSPM
Native scanner
Secrets
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Mar 19, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.