Xygeni
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Xygeni's? The following comparison
table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting
your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their
descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Xygeni
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
ASPM, malware
detection and SAST
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$4.32M
USD in 1 round from 1 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type
II and SOC
3
|
None |
|
|
Bug bounty
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability database
|
|||
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
|
Knowledge base
|
13 KB sections, 5
in common and 8 additional
|
||
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async training
|
No
|
||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (standard, premium,
enterprise). First 2
transparent
|
|
Minimum commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment period
|
|||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
10 developers
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Xygeni
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day
vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Min availability
|
>=99.95%
per minute LTM
|
No information available
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee and
contractor
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65
standards, 8 in common and
57 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
11 standards,
8 in common and 3 additional
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2,
1 in common and 1 additional
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
5, 2 in common and
3 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Xygeni
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus
1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
14 sources,
2 in common and 12 additional
|
3 sources, 2 in
common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Priority criteria
|
Same
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
|||
|
Scanner origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
12 package
managers, 11 in common and 1
additional
|
||
|
SCA (AI models)
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
Yes. No information
available
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
|||
|
SBOM
|
12 package managers, 9 in common and 3 additional | ||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Containers
|
Yes.
No information available
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
Yes. No information
available
|
||
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
No information
available
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
Custom rules for SAST
|
|
IaC
|
6,
5 in common and 1 additional
|
4,
1 in common and 3 additional
|
8,
6 in common and 2 additional
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of
binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security Testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
Environments
|
Left & Right (included)
|
Same
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and
secrets exploitability
|
Yes. No information
available
|
|
|
AI
|
No | ||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information
available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information
available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Xygeni
|
|
SCM
|
4, all in common
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
2, all in common |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 7 in common and 13
additional
|
7, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native and 2 integrations |
||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
Native and 4 integrations |
||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
Native | ||
|
Secrets
|
Native and 1 integration |
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Jun 13, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.