ZAP
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to ZAP's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ZAP
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
No information available
|
||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
No information available | ||
|
Headquarters
|
No information available
|
||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$100M
USD in 1 round from 1 investor
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
None | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB sections, 4
in common and 9 additional
|
4 KB sections,
all in common
|
|
|
Community
|
|||
|
Sync
training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Demo
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Pricing
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
Not applicable
|
|
Minimum
commit
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
Not applicable
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Not applicable
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ZAP
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
None | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Not applicable
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65 standards
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
No information available
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
Same, plus 1
|
No
|
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
7, 3
in common and 4 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
ZAP
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
No information
available
|
|
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
Yes. No information
available
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
7 attack surface
types, 5 in common and 2 additional
|
7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional |
|
|
API security
testing
|
No
|
4 types
of APIs, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
3 types of
APIs, all in common
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Environments
|
Left & Right
(included)
|
Same
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
Not applicable
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
Not applicable
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ZAP
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
None |
||
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 1 in
common and 19 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
None |
||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Aug 29, 2025.
More like ZAP
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.