ZeroPath
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to ZeroPath's? The following comparison table enables you to
discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's
cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ZeroPath
|
|
Focus
|
In-house scanners
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
Incident response, MPT and PTaaS
|
|
Headcount
|
6 | ||
| Headcount distribution |
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 17%, IT 17%, marketing 17% and others 49%
|
|
| Headcount growth |
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
0%, +20%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
US
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
DE and US
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
1K based on the following: LinkedIn, X
and YouTube
|
|
| Research firms |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2024
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$500K USD in 2 rounds from 4 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
1M to 5M
|
|
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
3 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
SOC 2 Type II | |
| Bug bounty |
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
7K per month. Top 3: 26% US, 12% IN,
11% CN. Others 51%
|
|
|
Authority
|
26 out of 100
|
||
| Public vulnerability DB |
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog and documentation
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 3 in common
and 10 additional
|
3 documentation sections, all in common
|
|
|
Community
|
Chat (discord)
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Free trial
|
No
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
| Open demo |
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and public web
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (Core, Enterprise). One
transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
5 repositories
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Repositories
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ZeroPath
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
MPT and PTaaS
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No information available | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability
research powered by AI
|
|
SLA
|
Response (Managed appsec) | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
5 from 3 different types
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 11 in common and 56
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
14 standards, 11 in common and 3
additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools, AI and human
intelligence
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
4, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, none in common
|
Same, plus 2
|
2, none in common
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
ZeroPath
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
REST with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 3 in common and 2
additional
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
1 functionality in common
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS v4.0
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
In-house
|
||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 10 in common and 13
additional
|
12 package managers, 10 in common and 2
additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Deterministic
|
||
|
SBOM
|
22 package managers, 8 in common and 14
additional
|
12 package managers, 8 in common and 4
additional
|
|
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Containers
|
4 distributions, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
5 distributions, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
12, 11 in common and 1 additional
|
18, 11 in common and 7 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
22, 5 in common and 17 additional
|
6, 5 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
IaC
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
7, 6 in common and 1 additional
|
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary in common
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
1 type of binary in common
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1
additional
|
4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1
additional
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets types, 3 in common and 8
additional
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
11 secrets type, 3 in common and 8
additional
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 2
additional
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
MCP
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
| Provisioning as code |
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS (no tenancy information)
|
||
| Regions |
US
|
||
|
Status
|
Yes
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ZeroPath
|
|
SCM
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
2, 1 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
1 |
|
IDE
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
CI/CD
|
21, 5 in common and 16 additional
|
5, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
Native
|
||
|
DAST
|
None
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
Native
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
| Bug bounty |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary source of information was
zeropath.com, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media,
and other sources.
More like ZeroPath
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.