Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Intruder | Fluid Attacks

Intruder

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Intruder's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Intruder
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners
Extras
None
None
Employees

77

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.66 from 228 reviews over 6 years on CapterraG2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
5K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$1.17M USD in 5 rounds from 3 investor
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
None
Compliance
Cyber EssentialsSOC2 Type I and SOC 2 Type II
Documentation
Visits
26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%
34K per month. Top 3: 42% US, 9% IN, 6% CA and others 43% 
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with of its partners
Marketplaces Azure and GitHub
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Intruder
PTaaS
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No information available
Secure code review
No
No information available
Pivoting
No
No information available
Exploitation
No
No information available
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
No information available
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 7 in common and 58 additional
All requirements from the same standards
7 standards, all in common
Detection
Remediation
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1
2, all in common
Outputs
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 2
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Intruder
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
No
CI/CD
Does not break the build
SCA
No
Reachability
No
SBOM
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
Same, plus 4
No
Source SAST (frameworks)

No

Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST
10 attack surface types, 3 in common and 7 additional

5 attack surface types, 3 in common and 2 additional

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
No
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Intruder
SCM
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
3, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, all in common

4, 3 in common and 1 additional

ChatOps
None
None

2

IDE

None

CI/CD
20, 3 in common and 17 additional
3, all in common
SCA

None

Container

None

SAST

None

DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, all in common
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Compliance
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.