Kondukto
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Kondukto's? The following comparison table
enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your
company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Kondukto
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
9.87 from 30 reviews over
2 years
on Gartner
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$1.2M
USD in 2 rounds from
3
investor
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II | ||
|
Bug bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
|||
|
Knowledge base
|
13 KB sections, 4
in common and 9 additional
|
5 KB
sections, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use
courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS and Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
No information available
|
|
Minimum commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment period
|
|||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
1 application
and 1 user
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Applications
and users
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Kondukto
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Min availability
|
>=99.95%
per minute LTM
|
No information available
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not
applicable
|
Not
applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable |
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65
standards, 6 in common and
59
additional
|
All requirements from
the same
standards
|
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated
tools and AI
|
||
|
Remediation
|
5, 2 in common and 3
additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 2 in common and
3
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
3, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Kondukto
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Priority criteria
|
|||
|
Custom prioritization
|
|||
|
Scanner origin
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
No
|
||
|
SBOM
|
Yes. No information
available
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
Same,
plus 4
|
No
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of
binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and
secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
||
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Kondukto
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, all in common
|
4, 3 in common and 1 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 8 in common and 12
additional
|
8, all in
common
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
8 | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Sep 18, 2025.
More like Kondukto
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.