Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Tenable | Fluid Attacks

Tenable

How does Fluid Attacks' service compare to Tenable's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs.

Criteria Fluid Attacks Essential Fluid Attacks Advanced Tenable
Accuracy Our SAST tool achieved the best possible result against the OWASP Benchmark: a TPR (True Positive Rate) of 100% and an FPR (False Positive Rate) of 0%. We identify 90% of the evaluated systems' risk exposure. (Accuracy is calculated with the F1 score. Risk exposure is calculated with the formula CVSSF=4^(CVSS-4).) Nessus, Tenable's vulnerability assessment solution, found around 33% of the vulnerabilities in a study with WAVSEP. Tenable says Nessus has the industry's lowest false positive rate at 0.32 defects per million scans.
Binary SAST No Yes. We support Java Bytecode, x86 ASM and ARM ASM. No
Source SAST Yes. We support the following languages: Bash, C#, Dart, Go, HTML, Java, Javascript, Kotlin, PHP, Python, Swift and Typescript
Yes. Its capability is equal to that of the Essential plan. Yes
DAST Yes. We can scan single-page apps (SPA), multi-page apps (MPA), REST API, GraphQL API and gRPC API. Yes. Its capability is equal to that of the Essential plan. Yes
IAST No No No
SCA Yes. We support the following package managers: Cargo, Composer, Conan, Docker Images, GitHub Actions, Go, Gradle, Hex, Maven, NPM, NuGet, pNPM, pip, Poetry, Pub, RubyGems, SBT, SwiftPM and Yarn. Yes. Its capability is equal to that of the Essential plan. Yes
Reverse engineering No Yes No
Secure code review No Yes No
Manual penetration testing No Yes No
CSPM Yes Yes
ASPM (previously, ASOC) Yes Yes No
Compliance We validate some requirements based on these standards and guidelines: Agile Alliance, BIZEC-APP, BSAFSS, BSIMM, CAPEC™, CASA, CCPA, CERT-C, CERT-J, C2M2, CMMC, CIS, CPRA, CWE™, CWE TOP 25, ePrivacy Directive, FACTA, FedRAMP, FERPA, FISMA, GDPR, GLBA, HIPAA, HITRUST CSF, ISA/IEC 62443, ISSAF, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27002, LGPD, MISRA-C, MITRE ATT&CK®, MVSP, NERC CIP, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-63B, NIST 800-171, NIST 800-115, NIST CSF, NIST SSDF, NYDFS, NY SHIELD Act, OSSTMM3, OWASP ASVS, OWASP API Security Top 10, OWASP MASVS, OWASP-M TOP 10, OWASP SAMM, OWASP SCP, OWASP Top 10, OWASP Top 10 Privacy Risks, PCI DSS, PDPA, PDPO, POPIA, PTES, Resolution SB 2021 2126, SANS 25, SIG Core, SIG Lite, SOC2®, SWIFT CSCF, WASSEC and WASC. We validate requirements based on these standards and guidelines: Agile Alliance, BIZEC-APP, BSAFSS, BSIMM, CASA, CCPA, CERT-C, CERT-J, CMMC, C2M2, CAPEC™, CIS, CWE™, CWE TOP 25, ePrivacy Directive, FACTA, FCRA, FedRAMP, FERPA, FISMA, GDPR, GLBA, HIPAA, HITRUST CSF, ISA/IEC 62443, ISSAF, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27002, LGPD, MISRA-C, MITRE ATT&CK®, MVSP, NERC CIP, NIST 800-53, NIST 800-63B, NIST 800-115, NIST 800-171, NIST CSF, NIST SSDF, NYDFS, NY SHIELD Act, OWASP API Security Top 10, OWASP ASVS, OWASP MASVS, OWASP SCP, OWASP SAMM, OWASP Top 10, OWASP-M Top 10, OWASP Top 10 Privacy Risks, OSSTMM3, PA-DSS, PCI DSS, PDPA, PDPO, POPIA, PTES, Resolution SB 2021 2126, SANS 25, SIG Core, SIG Lite, SOC2®, SWIFT CSCF and WASSEC. They validate the following standards: BASEL II, CIS, COBIT, DISA STIGs, FISMA, FDCC, GLBA, HIPAA, ISO 27002/17799, ITIL, NIST, NSA, PCI DSS, SOX, SDP, USGCB, and various state laws.
Certifications or attestations
Integrations
We offer the following integrations: (a) CI/CD: Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions, and GitLab CI; (b) IDE: VS Code; (c) runtime cloud: AWS, Azure, and GCP; (d) SCM: GitLab; and (e) ticketing: Jira.
Its capability is equal to that of the Essential plan.
They offer the following integrations: (a) vulnerability management: K2 and ZeroNorth, ASPIA InfoTech, FortMesa, Hackuity, Ivanti, Kenna, Nucleus, RedSeal, Rezilion, RHD VM (ALFA Group), Visium and XM Cyber; (b) ASM: Armis; (c) attack simulation: Cymulate, SafeBreach, XM Cyber, (d) CI/CD: GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins; (e) runtime cloud: Adaptive Shield, AWS, Check Point, CloudGuard, GCP, IBM Security, JupiterOne, Kion, Prisma Cloud, Sentra; (f) container registry: JFrog; (g) pentest management: PlexTrac; (h) SCM: Atlassian; (i) threat intelligence: Analyst1, Anomali, Brinqa, Criminal IP, Cybersixgill, Fletch, Hackuity, IntSights, Kenna, RedSeal, ThreatConnect, ThreatNG, ThreatQuotient and XM Cyber; (j) ticketing: Atlassian, Cherwell and ServiceNow.
Fast and automatic Yes Yes Fast scans performed by automated security testing tools.
Remediation We offer extensive documentation on fixes and functions in our IDE extension that leverage gen AI to get step-by-step remediation guidance and automated fixes. In addition to the Essential plan features, we offer the option of "Talk to a hacker" in which our experts help clients understand how to remediate the most challenging vulnerabilities. Yes
CI/CD security We can integrate with CI/CD systems and trigger a build pipeline failure to prevent from deploying a noncompliant software version into production (break the build). Offers the same capability as that of the Essential plan. They can break the build.
Vulnerability detection method Automated tools Hybrid (automated tools + AI + human intelligence) Automated tools
Vulnerability chaining No By combining vulnerabilities A and B, we discover a new, higher impact vulnerability C.
Delivery of evidence Our evidence is delivered in (a) PDF executive reports, (b) XLS/PDF technical reports, (c) code pieces and (d) graphs and metrics of the system's security status. We deliver all the types of evidence mentioned in the Essential plan, and additionally, (a) video recordings of the attack and (b) screenshots with explanatory annotations. Their evidence is delivered in (a) PDF/XML/HTML/CSV reports and (b) customized reports.
Exploitation No We can do exploitation as long as the client provides an available environment. Nessus can exploit some vulnerabilities benignly in the identification process.
Zero-day vulnerabilities No Our security researchers search for zero-day vulnerabilities in open-source software. They have a Zero-Day Research team specialized in discovering zero-day vulnerabilities.
AI/ML triage No Using artificial intelligence (AI), we prioritize potentially vulnerable files for their assessment. Our AI is specially trained by machine learning (ML) with thousands of snippets of vulnerable code. No
Status page
Demo Yes Yes No
Free trial Yes No No

Note on reference review date
References were last checked on April 24, 2024.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.