Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Cyver | Fluid Attacks

Cyver

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Cyver's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Cyver
Focus
AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
PTaaS and MPT
Extras
None
None
Employees

9

Reputation
Maximum of 9.69 based on 41 reviews over 6 years from: Clutch and Gartner Peer Insights.
Same
None
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
1K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research Firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
No information available
Revenue
No information available
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide.
None
Compliance
Documentation
Visits
35K per monthTop 3: 48% US, 15% FR, 7% CO and others 30%
9K per month. Top 3: 72% NL, 14% KE, 5% NG and others 9%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Marketplaces Azure
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Cyver
PTaaS
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes Yes
Secure code review
No
Pivoting
No
Chains vulnerabilities to reveal new, higher-impact ones.
No information available
Exploitation
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
No
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
No
SLA
 Availability, data traffic, filing a report, liability, planned maintenance, response and scheduled maintenance
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 11 in common and 54 additional.
All requirements from the same standards
19 standards, 11 in common and 8 additional.
Detection method
Remediation
remediation options, 1 in common and 4 additional.
Same, plus 1 remediation option.
1 remediation option in common
Outputs
5 formats, 3 in common and 2 additional.
Same, plus 2 formats.
6 formats, 3 in common and 3 additional.

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Cyver
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality.
No
CLI
No
CI/CD
Does not break the build
SCA
No
Reachability
No
SBOM
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
No
Source SAST (frameworks)

No

Binary SAST
1 type of binary.
Same, plus 2 types of binaries.
No
DAST

No

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability.
No
AI
No
Fast and automatic
No
Open source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
EU, UK and US
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Cyver
SCM integrations
None
Binary repositories integrations
None
None
None
Ticketing integrations
integrations, 2 in common and 1 additional.

integrations, all in common.

ChatOps integrations
None
None

None

IDE integrations

None

CI/CD integrations
None
SCA integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

None

Container integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

None

SAST integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

None

DAST integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

None

IAST integrations
None
None
None
Cloud Integrations
integrations, all in common.
None
CSPM integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
None
Secrets integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

None

Compliance integrations
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Feb 10, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.