Cyver
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Cyver's? The following comparison table
enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your
company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Cyver
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No
reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information
available
|
|
Revenue
|
No information available
|
||
|
CVE
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
||
|
Compliance
|
|||
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Cyver
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
||
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | Yes |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
||
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No information
available
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
||
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
No
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
Availability, data traffic, filing a report, liability, planned maintenance, response and scheduled maintenance | ||
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65
standards, 11 in common and 54
additional
|
All requirements from the same
standards
|
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
1 in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 3 in common and 2
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Cyver
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
Same, plus 4
|
No
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of
binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and
secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
Open source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Cyver
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
2, all in common |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
None |
||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.