JFrog

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to JFrog's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	JFrog
Focus	Native ASPM with built-in scanners	AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners	Built-in scanners
Extras	None	None	AI/ML development and deployment, artifact management, cloud deployment, enterprise IoT management, MLSecOps, release lifecycle management and tool consolidation
Employees	130	Same	1,997
Reputation	9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch	Same	8.68 from 117 reviews over 7 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner, GetApp, PeerSpot and Software Advice
Followers	18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube	Same	117K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms	None	None	451 Research, Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group, GigaOM and Omdia
Founded	2001	Same	2008
Funding	Bootstrapped	Same	$226.5M USD in 6 rounds from 12 investors (8 acquisitions)
Revenue	5M to 10M	Same	100M to 500M
CVE	257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide	Same	Pending
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3	Same	CSA STAR Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II and TISAX
Documentation	Yes	Yes	Yes
Visits	27K per month. Top 3: 51% BR, 8% IN, 7% CO and others 34%	Same	319K per month. Top 3: 19% US, 13% IN, 8% IL and others 60%
Authority	32 out of 100	Same	52 out of 100
Distribution	Direct or with any of its 14 partners	Same	Direct or with any of its 310 partners
Marketplaces	AWS	Same	AWS, Azure and GCP
Freemium	No	No	No
Free trial	21-day free trial	PoV	14-day free trial and PoC
Demo	Yes	Yes	Yes
Pricing	Contact sales and marketplace	Contact sales	Contact sales, marketplaces and public web
Pricing drivers	Groups	Authors	Consumable storage and developers

Service

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	JFrog
PTaaS	No	Yes	No
Reverse engineering	No	Yes	No
Secure code review	No	Yes	No
Pivoting	No	Yes	No
Exploitation	No	Yes	No
Zero-day vulnerabilities	None	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA	Availability	Accuracy, availability and response	Response and availability
Accreditations	CNA	Same	CNA
Hacker certifications	Not applicable	202 from 59 different types	Not applicable
Type of contract	Employee	Same	Employee
Standards	Some requirements from 65 standards, 5 in common and 60 additional	All requirements from the same standards	5 standards, all in common
Detection method	Automated tools	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence	Automated tools
Remediation	5, 2 in common and 3 additional	Same, plus 1	2 in common
Outputs	5, 3 in common and 2 additional	Same, plus 2	5, 3 in common and 2 additional

Product

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	JFrog
ASPM	Yes	Yes	No
IDE	5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional	Same, plus 1 functionality	3 functionalities, 2 in common and 1 additional
CLI	Yes	Yes	Yes
CI/CD	Breaks the build	Same	Breaks the build
SCA	24 package managers, 12 in common and 12 additional	Same	21 package managers, 12 in common and 9 additional
Reachability	5 languages, 4 in common and 1 additional	Same	5 languages, 4 in common and 1 additional
SBOM	22 package managers, 11 in common and 11 additional	Same	23 package managers, 11 in common and 12 additional
Containers	4 distributions	Same	Yes. No information available
Source SAST (languages)	18, 6 in common and 12 additional	Same	7, 6 in common and 1 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)	22	Same	No information available
Binary SAST	1 type of binary	Same, plus 2 types of binaries	14 types of binaries, none in common
DAST	10 attack surface types	Same	None
IAST	No	No	No
CSPM	Yes	Yes	No
Secrets	15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional	Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability	12 secrets types, 3 in common and 9 additional
AI	3 functions	Same	1 function, none in common
Open-source	MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version	Not applicable	No
Deployment	SaaS	Same	SaaS and on-premises
Regions	US	Same	AMER, APAC and EMEA
Status	Yes	Yes	Yes
Incidents	6 per year	Same	No information available

Integrations

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	JFrog
SCM	4	Same	4, all in common
Binary repositories	None	None	1
Ticketing	3, 1 in common and 2 additional	Same	1 in common
ChatOps	None	None	2
IDE	2, all in common	Same	4, 2 in common and 2 additional
CI/CD	20, 9 in common and 11 additional	Same	11, 9 in common and 2 additional
SCA	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner
Container	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner
SAST	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner
DAST	Native scanner	Same	1
IAST	None	None	None
Cloud	3 integrations	Same	None
CSPM	Native scanner	Same	None
Secrets	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner
Compliance	None	None	None

References were last checked on Mar 19, 2024.

Free trial

Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.

Comparison between Fluid Attacks and JFrog | Fluid Attacks

JFrog