JFrog

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to JFrog's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	JFrog
Focus	Native ASPM with In-house scanners	AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners	Built-in scanners
Extras	None	None	AI/ML development and deployment, artifact management, cloud deployment, enterprise IoT management, MLSecOps, release lifecycle management and tool consolidation
Headcount	136	Same	2,179
Headcount distribution	Engineering 40%, IT 15%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%	Same	Engineering 32%, IT 10%, sales 11%, marketing 3%, operations 6% and others 38%
Headcount growth	+3%, -2%, -7%	Same	+9%, +14%, +44%
Headquarters	86% CO	Same	43% IL
Countries	CO and US	Same	IL, US, JP, CN, FR, IN, ES and GB
Reputation	9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch	Same	8.52 from 126 reviews over 8 years on G2, Gartner, TrustRadius and PeerSpot
Followers	20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube	Same	130K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms	None	None	451 Research, Forrester, Frost & Sullivan, IDC, Info-Tech Research Group, GigaOM and Omdia
Founded	2001	Same	2008
Funding	Bootstrapped	Same	$226.5M USD in 6 rounds from 12 investors
Acquisitions	None	None	Acquired 0 times and made 8 acquisitions
Revenue	5M to 10M	Same	100M to 500M
CVE	257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide	Same	87 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3	Same	CSA STAR Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II and TISAX
Bug bounty	Yes	Yes	No
Visits	19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%	Same	299K per month. Top 3: 30% US, 8% IN, 7% DE and others 55%
Authority	32 out of 100	Same	51 out of 100
Vulnerability database	Discovered and third-party	Same	Discovered and third-party
Content	Blog, documentation, e-books, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers	Same	Blog, data sheets, documentation, e-books, infographics, webinars and white papers
Knowledge base	13 KB sections, 3 in common and 10 additional	Same	3 KB sections, all in common
Community	Forum	Same	No
Sync training	1 workshop	Same	4 live security education courses (subscription-based)
Async training	3 product use courses, all free	Same	6 product use courses with certification (subscription-based) and 1 product use course (free)
Distribution	Direct or with any of its 14 partners	Same	Direct or with any of its 310 partners
Marketplaces	AWS	Same	AWS, Azure and GCP
Freemium	No	No	No
Free trial	21-day free trial	PoV	14-day free trial and PoC
Demo	Yes	Yes	Yes
Open Demo	No	No	No
Pricing	Contact sales, marketplace and public web	Contact sales and public web	Contact sales, marketplaces and public web
Pricing tiers	1 plan	1 plan	3 Plans (pro, enterprise X, enterprise +). First transparent
Minimum term	Monthly	Monthly	Monthly
Minimum payment period	Monthly	Monthly	Monthly
Minimum capabilities	API security testing, ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets	Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR	Binary repository, docker hub pulls and lifecycle management
Minimum scope	1 group	1 author	25 GB base consumption
Pricing drivers	Groups	Authors	Consumable storage and developers
Minimum monthly payment	1,529 USD	1,529 + 429 USD	150 USD

Service

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	JFrog
PTaaS	No	Yes	No
Reverse engineering	No	Yes	No
Secure code review	No	Yes	No
Pivoting	No	Yes	No
Exploitation	No	Yes	No
Manual reattacks	Not applicable	Unlimited reattacks	Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities	None	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA	Availability	Accuracy, availability and response	Response and availability
Min availability	>=99.95% per minute LTM	Same	>=99.9% per month
After-sale guarantees	No	Yes	No
Accreditations	CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST	Same	AWS Outposts Ready Product, AWS PrivateLink Ready Product, DevOps ISV Competency and CNA
Hacker certifications	Not applicable	202 from 59 different types	Not applicable
Type of contract	Employee	Same	Employee
Endpoint control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Channel control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Standards	Some requirements from 67 standards, 5 in common and 62 additional	All requirements from the same standards	5 standards, all in common
Detection method	Automated tools	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence	Automated tools
False positives	4.21 times better	6.62 times better	14% F0.5 score per quantity
False negatives	17.55 times better	6.10 times better	4% F2.0 score per severity
Remediation	5, 2 in common and 3 additional	Same, plus 1	2 in common
Outputs	5, 3 in common and 2 additional	Same, plus 2	5, 3 in common and 2 additional

Product

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	JFrog
ASPM	Yes	Yes	No
API	GraphQL with JSON	Same	REST with JSON
IDE	5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional	Same, plus 1 functionality	3 functionalities, 2 in common and 1 additional
CLI	Yes	Yes	Yes
CI/CD	Breaks the build	Same	Breaks the build
Vulnerability sources	4 sources, 2 in common and 2 additional	Same	4 sources, 2 in common and 2 additional
Threat model alignment	Yes	Yes	No
Priority criteria	CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV	Same	CVSS v3.0 and EPSS
Custom prioritization	Priority score	Same	No
Scanner origin	In-house	In-house	In-house
SCA	23 package managers, 12 in common and 11 additional	Same	21 package managers, 12 in common and 9 additional
AI security	No	Yes	Yes
Reachability	12 languages, 5 in common and 7 additional	Same	No
Reachability type	Deterministic	Same	Not applicable
SBOM	22 package managers, 11 in common and 11 additional	Same	23 package managers, 11 in common and 12 additional
Malware detection	Yes	Yes	Yes
Autofix on components	No	No	No
Containers	4 distributions	Same	Yes. No information available
Source SAST (languages)	12, 6 in common and 6 additional	Same	8, 6 in common and 2 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)	22	Same	No information available
Custom rules	No	No	SCA
IaC	6	4	No
Binary SAST	1 type of binary	Same, plus 2 types of binaries	14 types of binaries, none in common
DAST	7 attack surface types	Same	No
API security testing	No	4 types of APIs	No
IAST	No	No	No
CSPM	Yes	Yes	No
ASM	No	No	No
Secrets	15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional	Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability	12 secrets types, 3 in common and 9 additional
AI	3 functions	Same	1 function, none in common
MCP	Yes	Yes	Yes
Open-source	MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version	Not applicable	No
Provisioning as Code	Yes	Yes	Yes
Deployment	SaaS	Same	SaaS and on-premises
Regions	US	Same	AMER, APAC and EMEA
Status	Yes	Yes	Yes
Incidents	4 per year	Same	No information available

Integrations

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	JFrog
SCM	6, 4 in common and 2 additional	Same	4, all in common
Binary repositories	None	None	Native
Ticketing	3, 1 in common and 2 additional	Same	1 in common
ChatOps	None	None	2
IDE	3, 2 in common and 1 additional	Same	4, 2 in common and 2 additional
CI/CD	21, 9 in common and 12 additional	Same	11, 9 in common and 2 additional
SCA	Native	Same	Native
Container	Native	Same	Native
SAST	Native	Same	Native
DAST	Native	Same	1
IAST	None	None	None
Cloud	3	Same	None
CSPM	Native	Same	None
Secrets	Native	Same	Native
Remediation	None	None	None
Bug bounty	None	None	None
Vulnerability management	None	None	None
Compliance	None	None	None

References were last checked on Oct 23, 2025.

More like JFrog

Free trial

Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.

Comparison between Fluid Attacks and JFrog | Fluid Attacks

JFrog