JFrog
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to JFrog's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
JFrog
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
Maximum of 8.78 based on 111 reviews over 7 years from: Capterra, G2, Gartner Peer Insights, GetApp, PeerSpot and Software Advice.
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide.
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 2 Type II and TISAX (automobile) |
|
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its 306 partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure and GCP | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
14-day free trial and PoC
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
JFrog
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
Chains vulnerabilities to reveal new, higher-impact ones.
|
No
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
|
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
|
|
SLA
|
Response | ||
|
Accreditations
|
|||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 5 in common and 60 additional.
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
5 standards, all in common.
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
False positives
|
4.21 times better
|
6.62 times better
|
14% F0.5 score per quantity
|
|
False negatives
|
6.10 time better
|
17.55 times better
|
4% F2.0 score per severity
|
|
Remediation
|
4 remediation options, 1 in common and 3 additional.
|
Same, plus 1 remediation option.
|
1 remediation option in common.
|
|
Outputs
|
5 formats, 3 in common and 2 additional.
|
Same, plus 2 formats.
|
5 formats, 3 in common and 2 additional.
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
JFrog
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
IDE
|
3 functionalities, 1 in common and 2 additional.
|
1 functionality in common.
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Reachability
|
5 languages, 4 in common and 1 additional.
|
5 languages, 4 in common and 1 additional.
|
|
|
SBOM
|
|||
|
Containers
|
Yes. No information available |
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
24 languages, 6 in common and 18 additional.
|
Same, plus others
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
20 frameworks, 3 in common and 17 additional.
|
Same, plus others
|
No information available |
|
Binary SAST
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries.
|
14 types of binaries, none in common.
|
|
|
DAST
|
5 attack surfaces, 3 in common and 2 additional.
|
No |
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional.
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability.
|
12 secrets types, 3 in common and 9 additional.
|
|
AI
|
3 functions.
|
No
|
|
|
Fast and automatic
|
|||
|
Open source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Pending
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
JFrog
|
|
SCM integrations
|
4 integrations, all in common.
|
4 integrations, all in common.
|
|
|
Binary repositories integrations
|
None
|
None
|
1 integration.
|
|
Ticketing integrations
|
3 integrations, 1 in common and 2 additional.
|
1 integration in common. |
|
|
ChatOps integrations
|
None |
None
|
2 integrations. |
|
IDE integrations
|
8 integrations, 2 in common and 6 additional. |
||
|
CI/CD integrations
|
23 integrations, 11 in common and 12 additional.
|
11 integrations, all in common.
|
|
|
SCA integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
Container integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner, (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
SAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
DAST integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
||
|
IAST integrations
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud Integrations
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
None | |
|
Secrets integrations
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
|
Native scanner (included, no integration needed) |
|
|
Compliance integrations
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Dec 20, 2024.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.