Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Praetorian | Fluid Attacks

Praetorian

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Praetorian's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Praetorian
Focus
AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
Extras
None
None
Employees

183

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.23 from 6 reviews over 1 year on Gartner
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
23K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$10M USD in 1 rounds from 2 investors
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
None
Compliance
SOC 2 Type II
Documentation
Visits
27K per month. Top 3: 51% BR, 8% IN, 7% CO and others 34%
41K per month. Top 3: 56% US, 18% ID, 9% AE and others 17%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Marketplaces AWS
Freemium
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Praetorian
PTaaS
No
MPT and PTaaS
Reverse engineering
No
Yes Yes
Secure code review
No
Pivoting
No
Exploitation
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA
No information available
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Pending
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 7 in common and 58 additional
All requirements from the same standards
7 standards, all in common
Detection method
Remediation
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 1 in common
2, all in common
Outputs
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 2
5, 2 in common and 3 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Praetorian
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
CI/CD
Does not break the build
SCA
No
Reachability
No
SBOM
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
Same, plus 4
No
Source SAST (frameworks)

No

Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST
10 attack surface types, 4 in common and 6 additional

4 attack surface types, all in common

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 6 in common and 9 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
6 secret types, all in common
AI
3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional
2 functions, 1 in common and 1 additional
Open source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
No information available
Status
No
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Praetorian
SCM
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
3, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

1 in common

ChatOps
None
None

3

IDE

None

CI/CD
20, 3 in common and 17 additional
3, all in common
SCA

5

Container

4

SAST

None

DAST

4

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, all in common
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
CSPM
3
Secrets

None

Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Mar 21, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.