Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Snyk | Fluid Attacks

Snyk

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Snyk's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Snyk
Focus
AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Employees

1.247

Reputation
Maximum of 9.69 based on 41 reviews over 6 years from: Clutch and Gartner Peer Insights.
Same
Maximum of 9.01 based on 282 reviews over 6 years from: Gartner Peer InsightsG2PeerSpotSoftware Advice and TrustRadius.
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
121K based on the following: FacebookLinkedInX and YouTube
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$1.2B USD in 13 rounds from 40 investors (11 Acquisitions)
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide.
Pending
Compliance
Documentation
Visits
38K per month. Top 3: 48% CO, 16% GB, 11% US and others 25%
1.1M per month. Top 3: 13% IN, 11% US, 6% CN and others 70%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 87 partners
Marketplaces AWSAzureGCP and GitHub
Freemium
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Snyk
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
Chains vulnerabilities to reveal new, higher-impact ones.
No
Exploitation
No
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
Zero-day vulnerability research continuously
SLA
Initial support response
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 15 in common and 50 additional.
All requirements from the same standards
16 standards, 15 in common and 1 additional.
Detection method
False positives
1.28 times better
1.39 times better
66% F0.5 score per quantity
False negatives
1 time better
1.39 times better
55% F2.0 score per severity
Remediation
4 remediation options, 3 in common.
Same, plus 1 remediation option.
3 remediation options, all in common.
Outputs
5 formats, 4 in common and 1 additional.
Same, plus 2 formats.
formats, 4 in common and 1 additional.

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Snyk
ASPM
Yes
IDE
functionalities, 2 in common and 1 additional.
functionalities, all in common.
CLI
CI/CD
SCA
19 package managers, 15 in common and 4 additional.
21 package managers, 15 in common and 6 additional.
Reachability
languages, 3 in common and 2 additional.
3 languages, all in common.
SBOM
19 package managers, 15 in common and 4 additional.
21 package managers, 15 in common and 6 additional.
Containers
distributions, 3 in common and 1 additional.
10 distributions, 3 in common and 7 additional.
Source SAST (languages)
24 languages, 12 in common and 12 additional.
Same, plus others
24 languages, 12 in common and 12 additional.
Source SAST (frameworks)
20 frameworks, 12 in common and 8 additional.
Same, plus others

28 frameworks, 12 in common and 16 additional.

Binary SAST
1 type of binary.
No
DAST
attack surfaces, all in common.

attack surfaces, 5 in common and 4 additional.

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
16 secrets types, 5 in common and 11 additional.
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability.
5 secrets types, all in common.
AI
3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional.
1 function in common.
Fast and automatic
Open source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
AUEU and US
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Snyk
SCM integrations
integrations, all in common.
integrations, all in common
Binary repositories integrations
None
None
Ticketing integrations
integrations, 1 in common and 2 additional.

integration in common.

ChatOps integrations
None
None

integration.

IDE integrations
integrations, all in common.

13 integrations, 2 in common and 11 additional.

CI/CD integrations
17 integrations, all in common.
integrations, all in common.
SCA integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

Container integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)

Native scanner and 1 integration.

SAST integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
DAST integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
IAST integrations
None
None
None
Cloud Integrations
integrations, all in common.
integrations, all in common.
CSPM integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
1 integration.
Secrets integrations
Native scanner (included, no integration needed)
Compliance integrations
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Nov 22, 2024.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.