Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Snyk | Fluid Attacks

Snyk

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Snyk's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Snyk
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount

1,282

Headcount distribution
Headcount growth
Same
Headquarters
Countries
 CO and US
AUCACHGBIL, JP, ROSG and US 
Reputation
9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on  Gartner and Clutch
Same
8.96 from 308 reviews over 7 years on G2Gartner, PeerSpotSoftware Advice and TrustRadius
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
135K based on the following: FacebookLinkedInX and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$1.2B USD in 13 rounds from 42 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
Acquired 0 times and made 12 acquisitions
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
809 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
Bug bounty
No
Visits
19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%
630K per month. Top 3: 26% US, 16% IN, 5% DE and others 53%
Authority
Vulnerability database
Content
Knowledge base
13 KB sections, 3 in common and 10 additional
5 KB sections, 3 in common and 2 additional
Community
Same
Sync training
No
No
No
Async training
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 87 partners
Marketplaces AWSGCP and GitHub
Freemium
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing tiers
2 plans (team, enterprise). First transparent
Minimum commit
Minimum payment period
Monthly Monthly
Minimum capabilities
API security testingASPMbinary SASTcontainers, CSPMDASTIaC, SASTSCA and secrets Same plus: PTaaSRE and SCR Containers, IaC, SAST and SCA
Minimum scope
group author developers (active committers)
Pricing drivers
Authors
Minimum monthly payment

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Snyk
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA
Availability and response
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
Same
>=99.5% unknown per period
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes No
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 15 in common and 50 additional
All requirements from the same standards
16 standards, 15 in common and 1 additional
Detection method
False positives
1.21 times better
1.90 times better
49% F0.5 score per quantity
False negatives
1.07 times better
3.07 times better
25% F2.0 score per severity
Remediation
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1
3, all in common
Outputs
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
Same, plus 2
5, 4 in common and 1 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Snyk
ASPM
Yes
Yes (as an add-on, only for the Enterprise plan)
API
 Same
REST with JSON
IDE
5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
4 functionalities, 3 in common and 1 additional
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources
6 sources, none in common
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSFEPSS and KEV
Custom prioritization
Scanner origin
In-house and External (GitGuardian and Nightfall AI for Secrets)
SCA
24 package managers, 16 in common and 8 additional
21 package managers, 16 in common and 5 additional
AI security
No
No
Reachability
12 languages, 4 in common and 8 additional
4 languages, all in common
Reachability type
SBOM
22 package managers, 6 in common and 16 additional
6 package managers, all in common
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
Yes
Autofix on components
No
No
Containers
distributions, 3 in common and 1 additional
11 distributions, 3 in common and 8 additional
Source SAST (languages)
12, 11 in common and 1 additional
19 languages, 11 in common and 8 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)
22, 13 in common and 9 additional

28 frameworks, 12 in common and 16 additional

Custom rules
No
No
IaC
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
6, all in common
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

No

API security testing
No types of APIs
No
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
Environments
Left & Right (included)
Same
Left & Right (at extra cost)
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 5 in common and 10 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
5 secrets types, all in common
AI
4 functions, 1 in common and 3 additional
1 function in common
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
AU, EU and US
Status
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Snyk
SCM
4
4, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
Ticketing
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

1 in common

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

13, 2 in common and 11 additional

CI/CD
20, 5 in common and 15 additional
7, 5 in common and 2 additional
SCA
Container

Native and 1 integration

SAST
DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, all in common
CSPM
Native
Secrets

Native powered by  GitGuardian and 1 integration

Remediation
None
None
3
Bug bounty
None
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
Compliance
None
None
2

Notes
 References were last checked on Aug 29, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.