AppCheck
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to AppCheck's? The following comparison
table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting
your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
AppCheck
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information
available
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
13 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
||
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | Azure | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
No information available
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
AppCheck
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability
research
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability
research
|
|
SLA
|
Resolution and response | ||
|
Accreditations
|
|||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65
standards, 10 in common and 55
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
1 in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
3, 1 in common and 2
additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
AppCheck
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
Same, plus 4
|
No
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of
binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
10 attacks surfaces, 7 in common and 3 additional |
||
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and
secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
Open source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information
available
|
||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
AppCheck
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 2 in common and 18 additional
|
2, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
None |
||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.