Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Tenable Nessus | Fluid Attacks

Tenable Nessus

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Tenable Nessus's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Info
This comparison focuses exclusively on the product itself, even though it belongs to a larger parent company. All information collected is based on the product’s technical, functional, and theoretical capabilities, not on attributes of the parent company.
Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Tenable Nessus
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners
Extras
None
None
Headcount
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Headcount distribution
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Headcount growth
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Headquarters
CO and US
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Countries
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Reputation
9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.01 from 1126 reviews over 10 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
No information available
Acquisitions
None
None
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Revenue
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
CVEs as CNA Researcher
276 CVEs reported to MITRE , ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA Researcher
Compliance
Bug bounty
No
Visits
21K per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Authority
Indeterminable (no information for this product alone)
Public vulnerability DB
Tenable - Third-party
Content
Same
Comprehensive documentation
13 documentation sections, 7 in common and 6 additional
7 documentation sections, all in common
Community
Forum by Tenable
Sync training
No
Async training
5 product use courses by Tenable (all with paid with certification)
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 430 partners
Marketplaces AWS and Azure
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Open Demo
No
No
No
Pricing
Pricing tiers
2 plans (professional, expert). All transparent
Minimum term
Minimum payment period
Minimum capabilities
Same plus: API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
Minimum scope
No information available
Pricing drivers
Minimum monthly payment
Free implementation
Free support

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Tenable Nessus
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA
Availability
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
>= 99.95% per month
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
Accreditations
Amazon Linux Ready Product, AWS Graviton Ready Product, DevOps ISV Competency and Security ISV Competency (as Tenable)
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 67 standards, 10 in common and 57 additional
All requirements from the same standards
20 standards, 10 in common and 10 additional
Detection method
Remediation
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 1
1 in common
Outputs
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 2
5, 3 in common and 2 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Tenable Nessus
ASPM
No
API
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources
4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional
2 sources, 1 in common and 1 additional
Threat model alignment
No
Priority criteria
Custom prioritization
Scanner origin
SCA
No
AI security
No
No
Reachability
No
Reachability type
Not applicable
SBOM
Yes. No information available
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
Yes. Only for OSs
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
No
Source SAST
(languages)
No
Source SAST
(frameworks)
No
Custom rules
No
No
IaC
6, 3 in common and 3 additional
4, 1 in common and 3 additional
4, all in common
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST
7 attack surface types, 6 in common and 1 additional
7 attack surface types, 6 in common and 1 additional
API security Testing
No
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
No
MCP
No
Open-source
MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
AE, EU, BR, CA, EU, IL, IN, JP, KR, SG, UK and US
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Tenable Nessus
SCM
6, 2 in common and 4 additional
2, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
None
ChatOps
None
None
None
IDE
None
CI/CD
21, 2 in common and 19 additional
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
SCA
None
Container
None
SAST
None
DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
2, all in common
CSPM
None
Secrets
None
Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
1
Vulnerability management
None
None
None
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
References were last checked on Dec 01, 2025.


Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.