Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Tenable Nessus | Fluid Attacks

Tenable Nessus

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Tenable Nessus's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Tenable Nessus 
Focus
AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
Extras
None
None
Employees

2,207

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
8.98 from 1048 reviews over 9 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
27K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and Youtube
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$565.4M USD in 5 rounds from 5 investors (9 acquisitions) 
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
Pending
Compliance
Documentation
Visits
27K per month. Top 3: 51% BR, 8% IN, 7% CO and others 34%
999K per month. Top 3: 31% US, 10% JP, 10% IN and others 49%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 433 partners
Marketplaces AWS and Azure
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Tenable Nessus
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA
Availability
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 11 in common and 54 additional
All requirements from the same standards
19 standards, 11 in common and 8 additional
Detection method
Remediation
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 1
1 in common
Outputs
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 2
5, 3 in common and 2 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Tenable Nessus
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
CI/CD
SCA
No
Reachability
No
SBOM
No information available
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
18, 3 in common and 15 additional
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)

No information available

Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST
10 attack surface types, 8 in common and 2 additional

11 attack surface types, 8 in common and 3 additional

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
No
Open source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
AE, EU, BR, CA, EU, IL, IN, JP, KR, SG, UK and US
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Tenable Nessus
SCM
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
2, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing

None

ChatOps
None
None

None

IDE

None

CI/CD
20, 2 in common and 18 additional
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
SCA

None

Container

None

SAST
DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
2, all in common
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Mar 19, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.