Breachlock
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Breachlock's? The
following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Breachlock
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$3.1M
USD in 2 rounds from 1 investor
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs reported to MITRE,
ranked in the top 10 CVE labs
worldwide
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type
II and SOC
3
|
Cyber Essentials | |
|
Documentation
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
No
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Breachlock
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
||
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | Yes |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
||
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
||
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
||
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Accreditations
|
|||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee |
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards,
6 in common and 59 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
6 standards,
all in common
|
|
Detection
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5,
none in common
|
Same, plus 1
|
1, none in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
4,
3 in common and 1 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Breachlock
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
IDE
|
Same,
plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
Same,
plus 4
|
No
|
|
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same,
plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same,
plus verify other attack vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Breachlock
|
|
SCM
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
2, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 3 in common and 17 additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
None |
||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.