Faraday Security
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Faraday Security's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Faraday
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
None | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
Same
|
||
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB sections, 5
in common and 8 additional
|
5 KB sections, all in common
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync
training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Open Demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (professional
and corporate). All transparent
|
|
Minimum
commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
129 assets
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Faraday
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
||
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | Yes |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
||
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
||
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
No information available
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65 standards, 7 in
common and 58 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
10 standards, 7 in
common and 3 additional
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in
common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2, 1 in common
and 1 additional
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
5, 2 in common
and 3 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Faraday
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source
SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security
testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
GNU LGPL 3.0 license, partially equivalent to the
paid version
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Faraday
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 3 in common and 17
additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
|||
|
CSPM
|
2 | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Sep 16, 2025.
More like Faraday
Security
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.