Faraday Security
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Faraday Security's? The following comparison table enables you
to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's
cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Faraday
|
|
Focus
|
Vulnerability management
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
55 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 18%, IT 20%, sales 7%,
marketing 4%, operations 5% and others 46%
|
|
|
Headcount growth
|
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
0%, +4%, +20%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
AR and US | |
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
AR
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
10 from 10 reviews over 1 year on G2
and Gartner
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
14K based on the following: Instagram,
LinkedIn and X
|
|
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2014
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
1M to 5M
|
|
|
CVEs as CNA Researcher
|
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
None | |
|
Bug bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
8K per month. Top 3: 40% ES, 9% CN, 8%
DZ. Others 43%
|
|
|
Authority
|
25 out of 100
|
||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, documentation and support
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 5 in common
and 8 additional
|
5 documentation sections, all in common
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct or with any of its partners
|
|
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Free trial
|
5-day free trial
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and public web
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (professional and corporate).
All transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
ASOC
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
129 assets
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Assets
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
670 USD
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Faraday
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
No information available
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
6 from 5 different types
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee or freelance
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No information available
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 7 in common and 60
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
10 standards, 7 in common and 3
additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools and human
intelligence
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2, 1 in common and 1 additional
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 2 in common and 3
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Faraday
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes
|
||
|
API
|
REST with JSON
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS v4.0
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
GNU LGPL 3 license, partially equivalent to the paid version
|
|
|
Provisioning as code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy
information)
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Faraday
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
1 |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
21, 3 in common and 18 additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
5
|
||
|
Container
|
3 | ||
|
SAST
|
5
|
||
|
DAST
|
10
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, none in common
|
5, none in common
|
|
|
CSPM
|
2 | ||
|
Secrets
|
1
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information
were faradaysec.com and docs.faradaysec.com, which were supplemented by specialized
information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Faraday
Security
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.