Conviso

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Conviso's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Conviso
Focus	Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners	AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners	Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
Extras	None	None	Red team, MPT, PTaaS, Security training and WAF
Employees	139	Same	85
Reputation	9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch	Same	9.23 from 9 reviews over 3 years on Gartner and Software Advice
Followers	18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube	Same	7K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research Firms	None	None	Frost & Sullivan
Founded	2001	Same	2008
Funding	Bootstrapped	Same	No information available
Revenue	5M to 10M	Same	1M to 50M
CVE	257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide	Same	Pending
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3	Same	ISO/IEC 20000 and ISO/IEC 27001
Documentation	Yes	Yes	Yes
Visits	26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%	Same	10K per month. Top 3: 39% BR, 22% IN, 11% US and others 28%
Authority	31 out of 100	Same	29 out of 100
Distribution	Direct or with any of its 14 partners	Same	Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces	AWS	Same	AWS
Freemium	No	No	Yes
Free trial	21-day free trial	PoV	No
Demo	Yes	Yes	Yes
Pricing	Contact sales and marketplace	Contact sales	Contact sales, marketplace and public web site
Pricing drivers	Groups	Authors	Developers

Service

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Conviso
PTaaS	No	Yes	No. MPT
Reverse engineering	No	Yes	Yes
Secure code review	No	Yes	Yes
Pivoting	No	Yes	No information available
Exploitation	No	Yes	Yes
Zero-day vulnerabilities	None	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research	None
SLA	Availability	Accuracy, availability and response	Support
Accreditations	CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST	Same	None
Hacker certifications	Not applicable	202 from 59 different types	17 from 10 different types
Type of contract	Employee	Same	Employee
Standards	Some requirements from 65 standards, 4 in common and 61 additional	All requirements from the same standards	4 standards, all in common
Detection method	Automated tools	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence	Automated tools and human intelligence
Remediation	5	Same, plus 1	5, all in common
Outputs	5, 4 in common and 1 additional	Same, plus 2	4, all in common

Product

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Conviso
ASPM	Yes	Yes	Yes
IDE	5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional	Same, plus 1 functionality	2 functionalities, all in common
CLI	Yes	Yes	Yes
CI/CD	Breaks the build	Same	Breaks the build
SCA	24 package managers, 8 in common and 16 additional	Same	9 package managers, 8 in common and 1 additional
Reachability	12 languages	Same	No
SBOM	22 package managers, 11 in common and 11 additional	Same	21 package managers, 11 in common and 10 additional
Containers	4 distributions, 3 in common and 1 additional	Same	15 distributions, 3 in common and 12 additional
Source SAST (languages)	18, 11 in common and 7 additional	Same, plus 4. 2 in common and 2 additional	17, 13 in common and 4 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)	22, 2 in common and 20 additional	Same	3, 2 in common and 1 additional
Binary SAST	1 type of binary	Same, plus 2 types of binaries	No
DAST	10 attack surface types, 2 in common and 8 additional	Same	4 attack surface types, 2 in common and 2 additional
IAST	No	No	Yes. No information available
CSPM	Yes	Yes	No
Secrets	15 secrets types, 2 in common and 13 additional.	Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability	5 secrets types, 2 in common and 3 additional
AI	3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional	Same	1 function in common
Open source	MPL-2.0 license. Totally equivalent to the paid version	Not applicable	No
Deployment	SaaS	Same	SaaS and on-premises
Regions	US	Same	No information available
Status	Yes	Yes	Yes
Incidents	6 per year	Same	No information available

Integrations

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Conviso
SCM	4, 3 in common and 1 additional	Same	1 in common
Binary repositories	None	None	None
Ticketing	3, 2 in common and 1 additional	Same	3, 2 in common and 1 additional
ChatOps	None	None	2
IDE	2, 1 in common and 1 additional	Same	1 in common
CI/CD	20, 8 in common and 12 additional	Same	8, all in common
SCA	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner and 2 integration
Container	Native scanner	Same	None
SAST	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner and 4 integrations
DAST	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner
IAST	None	None	Native scanner
Cloud	3	Same	None
CSPM	Native scanner	Same	None
Secrets	Native scanner	Same	Native scanner
Compliance	None	None	None

References were last checked on Aug 28, 2025.

Free trial

Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.

Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Conviso | Fluid Attacks

Conviso