Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Dryrun Security | Fluid Attacks

Dryrun Security

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Dryrun Security's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Dryrun Security
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Employees

13

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
No reviews
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
1K based on LinkedIn and X
Research firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$11M USD in 2 rounds from 2 investors
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
None
Compliance
SOC 2 Type II
Documentation
Visits
26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%
668 per month. Top 3: 67% US, 23% IN, 8% LK and others 2%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Marketplaces GitHub
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers
No information available

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Dryrun Security
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
No information available
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards
All requirements from the same standards
No information available
Detection
Remediation
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1
3, all in common
Outputs
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 2
1 in common

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Dryrun Security
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
No
CI/CD
SCA
No
Reachability
No
SBOM
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
18, 11 in common and 7 additional
Same, plus 4
11, all in common
Source SAST (frameworks)

No information available

Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

No

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
Yes. No information available
AI
3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional
2 functions, 1 in common and 1 additional
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
No information available
Status
No
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Dryrun Security
SCM
4, 1 in common and 3 additional
1 in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

1 in common

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE

None

CI/CD
20, 1 in common and 19 additional
1 in common
SCA

None

Container

None

SAST
DAST

None

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.