Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Qwiet AI | Fluid Attacks

Qwiet AI

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Qwiet's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Qwiet AI
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with in-house scanners
Built-in scanners
Extras
None
None
PTaaS
Headcount 47
Headcount distribution
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
x
Headcount growth
+8%, +10%, -8%
x
Headquarters
CO and US
x
Countries
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and US
x
Reputation
9.77 from 209 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.96 from 48 reviews over 3 years on Capterra, G2 and Gartner
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
8K based on the following: LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
Info-Tech Research Group and Omdia
Founded
2001
2016
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$58.3M USD in 4 rounds from 7 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
x
Revenue
10M to 15M
1M to 8.8M
CVEs as CNA Researcher
276 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
None
Bug bounty
x
Documentation
Yes
Visits
22K per month. Top 3: 23% IN, 22% CO, 15% UK. Others 40%
6K per month. Top 3: 32% KW, 23% KE, 15% US and others 30%
Authority
28 out of 100
Public vulnerability DB
Discovered and third-party
x
Content
Blog, documentation, e-books, glossary, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers
Same
x
Comprehensive documentation
x
Community
x
Sync training
x
Async training
x
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces GitHub
Freemium
No
No
Yes
Free trial
Free-trial
Demo
Yes
Open Demo
No
No
x
Pricing
Contact sales
Pricing tiers
x
Minimum term
x
Minimum payment period
x
Minimum capabilities
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets
Same plus: API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
x
Minimum scope
x
Pricing drivers
No information available
Free implementation
x
Free support
x

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Qwiet AI
PTaaS
No
Yes
Reverse engineering
No
No information available
Secure code review
No
Yes
Pivoting
No
No information available
Exploitation
No
Yes
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
x
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
Availability and response
Minimum availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
x
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
x
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
1 from 1 type
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Employee or freelance
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
x
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
x
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 16 in common and 49 additional
All requirements from the same standards
16 standards, all in common
Detection
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
Remediation
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1
3, all in common
Outputs
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 2
4, 3 in common and 1 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Qwiet AI
ASPM
No
API
x
IDE
5 functionalities, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
2 functionalities, all in common
CLI
Yes
CI/CD
Breaks the build
Vulnerability sources
x
Threat model alignment
x
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV
x
Custom prioritization
x
Scanner origin
x
SCA
24 package managers, 12 in common and 12 additional
14 package managers, 12 in common and 2 additional
AI security
No
x
Reachability
Yes. No information available
Reachability type
x
SBOM
22 package managers, 3 in common and 19 additional
5 package managers, 3 in common and 2 additional
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
x
Autofix on components
No
No
x
Containers
4 distributions, 2 in common and 2 additional
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
Source SAST (languages)
18, 11 in common and 7 additional
14, 11 in common and 3 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)
22, 11 in common and 11 additional
39, 11 in common and 28 additional
Custom rules
No
No
x
IaC
x
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
2, none in common
DAST
No
API security testing
No
x
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
ASM
No
No
x
Secrets
15 secrets types, 7 in common and 8 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
28 secrets types, 7 in common and 21 additional
AI
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
2 functions, all in common
MCP
x
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
x
Deployment
SaaS
Regions
No information available
Status
No
Incidents
No information available

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Qwiet AI
SCM
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
3, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
1
ChatOps
None
None
1
IDE
2, all in common
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
CI/CD
20, 9 in common and 11 additional
11, 9 in common and 2 additional
SCA
Native scanner
Container
Native scanner
SAST
Native scanner
DAST
None
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets
Native scanner
Remediation
None
None
x
Bug bounty
None
None
x
Vulnerability management
None
None
x
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 18, 2025. The primary source of information was ---, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.

More like Qwiet AI
  1. Dryrun Security

Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.