Edgescan
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Edgescan's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Edgescan
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$13.6M USD in 4 rounds from 3 investors
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
None
|
||
|
Compliance
|
|||
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Edgescan
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
||
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No information available |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
||
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Accreditations
|
|||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 8 in common and 57 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
|
|
Detection
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
3, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Edgescan
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
SBOM
|
No | ||
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
Same, plus 4
|
No
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
9 attack surface types, 8 in common and 1 additional |
||
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional | ||
|
Open source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Edgescan
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 integration in common |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 3 in common and 17 additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
None |
||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.