Comparison between Fluid Attacks and HackerOne | Fluid Attacks

HackerOne

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to HackerOne's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
HackerOne
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners
Extras
None
None
Employees

5,509

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
8.8 from 102 reviews over 8 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot, Software Advice and TrustRadius
Followers
18K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
800K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$159.4M USD in 6 rounds from 14 investors (2 acquisitions)
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
1469 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
Documentation
Visits
26K per month. Top 3: 36% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%
2.2M per month. Top 3: 28% IN, 15% US, 3% KE and others 54%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 17 partners
Marketplaces AWS and Azure
Freemium
No
No
Free trial
No
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
HackerOne
PTaaS
No
Yes (as part of the bug bounty program)
Reverse engineering
No
Yes Yes
Secure code review
No
Pivoting
No
Exploitation
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research (Bug bounty)
SLA
 Time to: First Response, Triage, Bounty, and Resolution
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 15 in common and 50 additional
All requirements from the same standards
15 standards, all in common
Detection method
Remediation
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1 in common
2, all in common
Outputs
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 2
4, 1 in common and 3 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
HackerOne
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
No
CI/CD
Does not break the build
SCA
No
Reachability
12 languages
No
SBOM
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
No
Source SAST (frameworks)

No

Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

No

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional
1 function in common
Open-source
Not applicable
Not applicable
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
HackerOne
SCM
None
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3 integrations, all in common

15, 3 in common 12 additional

ChatOps
None
None

2

IDE

None

CI/CD
None
SCA

None

Container

None

SAST

None

DAST

None

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Compliance
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.