Comparison between Fluid Attacks and HCL AppScan | Fluid Attacks

HCL AppScan

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to HCL AppScan's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
HCL AppScan
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount

33

Headcount distribution
Headcount growth
Headquarters
Countries
 CO and US
Reputation
9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
8.84 from 322 reviews over 10 years on G2, Gartner, PeerSpot and TrustRadius
Followers
20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Same
15K based on the following: LinkedIn and X
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
No information available
Acquisitions
None
None
Acquired 3 times and made 1 acquisition
Revenue
No information available
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
291 CVEs reported to MITRE by HCL Software
Compliance
Bug bounty
Yes
Yes
No
Visits
19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%
252K per month. Top 3: 20% JP, 13% IN, 12% US and others 55%
Authority
Vulnerability database
Discovered None
Content
Knowledge base
13 KB sections, 6 in common and 7 additional
6 KB sections, all in common
Community
Forum
Same
No
Sync training
No
No No
Async training
100 product use courses with certification (paid)
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 97 partners
Marketplaces Azure
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing tiers
3 plans (silver, gold and platinum). All transparent
Minimum commit
Minimum payment period
Minimum capabilities
Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR
DASTIASTSAST and SCA
Minimum scope
1 scan
Pricing drivers
Minimum monthly payment

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
HCL AppScan
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
No information available
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
No information available
After-sale guarantees
No
Yes
No
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 19 in common and 46 additional
All requirements from the same standards
37 standards, 19 in common and 18 additional
Detection method
Remediation
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1
3 remediation options, all in common
Outputs
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 2
8, 3 in common and 5 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
HCL AppScan
ASPM
Yes
API
IDE
5 functionalities, 1 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1 IDE functionality
2 functionalities, 1 in common and 1 additional
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources
4 sources, 1 in common and 3 additional
3 sources, 1 in common and 2 additional
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV
Custom prioritization
No
Scanner origin
SCA
24 package managers, 4 in common and 20 additional
4 package managers, all in common
AI security
No
Reachability
12 languages
No
Reachability type
Not applicable
SBOM
22 package managers, 4 in common and 18 additional
4 package managers, all in common
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
Yes. No information available
Source SAST (languages)
12, all in common
29, 12 in common and 17 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)
22, 4 in common and 18 additional

10, 4 in common and 6 additional

Custom rules
No
No
IaC
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
4, all in common
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binary
7 types of binaries, 2 in common and 5 additional
DAST
attack surface types, 7 in common and 3 additional

8 attack surface types, 7 in common and 1 additional

API security testing
No
No
IAST
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Environments
Left & Right (included)
No
ASM
No
No
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 7 in common and 8 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
20 secrets types, 7 in common and 13 additional
AI
4 functions, 1 in common and 3 additional
1 function in common
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
HCL AppScan
SCM
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
2, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

3, 2 in common and 1 additional

ChatOps
None
None

None

IDE
2, all in common

11, 2 in common and 9 additional

CI/CD
20, 7 in common and 13 additional
7, all in common
SCA
Container

Native

SAST
DAST
IAST
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Aug 28, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.