CloudGuard
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to CloudGuard? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
CloudGuard
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
No information available |
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
Acquired 0 times and made 1 acquisition
|
|
Revenue
|
No information available
|
||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
None | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
No information available
|
||
|
Authority
|
No information available
|
||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
None
|
||
|
Content
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB sections
|
No information available
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync
training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure and GCP | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
|
Minimum
commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
No information available
|
||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
1 user
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
CloudGuard
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
None
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65 standards, 2 in common and 63 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated
tools and AI
|
||
|
Remediation
|
5, none in common
|
Same, plus 1
|
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
1 in common
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
CloudGuard
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
|||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
14 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
24 package managers, 8 in common and 16 additional
|
29 package managers, 8 in common and 21 additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
22 package managers, 7 in common and 15 additional
|
29 package managers, 7 in common and 22 additional
|
|
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
Yes. No information available |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IaC
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security
testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
Environments
|
Left & Right
(included)
|
Same
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
AI
|
No
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
CloudGuard
|
|
SCM
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
2 in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
2, 1 in common and 1 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 7 in common and 13 additional
|
10, 7 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
CSPM
|
3 | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Aug 28, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.