Opus Security
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Opus Security's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Opus
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$10M USD in 2 rounds from 11 investor
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
SOC 2 Type II | |
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
No
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
No information available
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Opus
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 9 in common and 56 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
9 standards, all in common
|
|
Detection
|
Automated tools and AI
|
||
|
Remediation
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
Same, plus 2
|
No information available
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Opus
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
No
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
Same, plus 4
|
No
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Opus
|
|
SCM
|
4, all in common
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, all in common
|
6, 3 in common and 3 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 3 in common and 17 additional
|
3, all in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
Native scanner and 9 integrations | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Mar 19, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.