Safety
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Safety's? The following comparison table enables you to discern
the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity
needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Safety
|
|
Focus
|
Software Supply Chain Security
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
Software Supply Chain Firewall
|
|
Headcount
|
24 | ||
| Headcount distribution |
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 50%, IT 17%, sales 4%, operations 4% and others 25%
|
|
| Headcount growth |
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
+9%, +41%, +200%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
CA
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
CA
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
2K based on the following: LinkedIn
and X
|
|
| Research firms |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2017
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
1M to 10M
|
|
| CVEs as CNA Researcher |
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
SOC 2 Type II | |
| Bug bounty |
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
3K per month. Top 3: 24% ID, 23% US,
12% RU. Others 41%
|
|
|
Authority
|
24 out of 100
|
||
| Public vulnerability DB |
Discovered and third-party
|
Discovered and third-party
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog and documentation
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
13 documentation sections, 3 in common
and 10 additional
|
7 documentation sections, 3 in common
and 4 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No
|
|
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct
|
|
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Free trial
|
Free-trial and PoV
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
| Open demo |
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and public web
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (team, enterprise). All
transparent
|
|
Minimum term
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Monthly
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API
security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
Firewall for malicious dependencies and
SCA
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
20 developers
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Developers
|
||
|
Minimum monthly payment
|
500 USD
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Safety
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
None | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 1 in common and 66
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
5 standards, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Automated tools and AI
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Safety
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
No
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
Yes
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Breaks the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
No information available
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS and EPSS
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
In-house
|
||
|
SCA
|
23 package managers, 2 in common and 21
additional
|
3 package managers, 2 in common and 1
additional
|
|
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
No information available
|
||
|
SBOM
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security Testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, none in common
|
1 function
|
|
|
MCP
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
MIT license, partially equivalent to
the paid version
|
|
| Provisioning as code |
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS + on-premises (no tenancy
information)
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
Yes
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Safety
|
|
SCM
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
4, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
None
|
||
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
21, 1 in common and 20 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
None
|
||
|
DAST
|
None
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
| Bug bounty |
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary sources of information
were getsafety.com and docs.safetycli.com, which were supplemented by specialized
information-gathering sites, social media, and other sources.
More like Safety
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.