Safety
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Safety's? The following
comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential
for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Safety
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Headcount
|
|||
|
Headcount
Distribution
|
|||
|
Headcount
Growth
|
|||
|
Headquarters
|
|||
|
Countries
|
Same
|
||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
No information available
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs
reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II | ||
|
Bug Bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
database
|
|||
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog and documentation
|
|
|
Knowledge
base
|
13 KB sections, 3
in common and 10 additional
|
7 KB sections, 3 in
common and 4 additional
|
|
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync
training
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Async
training
|
3 product
use courses, all free
|
No
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | None | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
Free-trial and PoV
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
2 plans (team,
enterprise). All transparent
|
|
Minimum
commit
|
|||
|
Minimum payment
period
|
|||
|
Minimum
capabilities
|
|||
|
Minimum
scope
|
1 group
|
1 author
|
|
|
Pricing
drivers
|
|||
|
Minimum monthly
payment
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Safety
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Manual
reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
SLA
|
None | ||
|
Min
availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale
guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Endpoint
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Channel
control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
Not applicable
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements
from 65 standards, 2 in
common and 63 additional
|
All requirements from
the same standards
|
5, 2 in
common and 3 additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools
and AI
|
||
|
Remediation
|
5, 2 in
common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2,
all in
common
|
|
Outputs
|
5,
1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same,
plus 2
|
3,
1 in common and 2 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Safety
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
API
|
No
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1
functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
Vulnerability
sources
|
14 sources,
none in common
|
No information available
|
|
|
Priority
criteria
|
Same
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner
origin
|
|||
|
SCA
|
24 package managers, 3 in
common and 21 additional
|
3 package
managers, all in common
|
|
|
SCA (AI
models)
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
Yes. No information
available
|
|
|
Reachability
type
|
No information available
|
||
|
SBOM
|
Yes.
No information available
|
||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type
of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
API security
Testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Environments
|
Left & Right
(included)
|
Same
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets
exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
4 functions,
none in common
|
1 function
|
|
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
MIT
license, partially equivalent to the paid
version
|
|
|
Provisioning as Code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS and on-premises
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Safety
|
|
SCM
|
4,
all in common
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
None |
||
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
None |
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 1 in
common and 19
additional
|
1 in
common
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
None |
||
|
SAST
|
None |
||
|
DAST
|
None |
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None |
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Jun 13, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan,
which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.