Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Sonatype | Fluid Attacks

Sonatype

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Sonatype's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Sonatype
Focus
AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
Extras
None
None
Employees

521

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on: Gartner and Clutch
Same
8.9 from 75 reviews over 6 years on: G2GartnerPeerSpotSoftware Advice and TrustRadius
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
41K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$154.7M USD in 6 rounds from 8 investors (2 acquisitions)
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
10 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
Documentation
Visits
26K per month. Top 336% MY, 33% CO, 5% IN and others 26%
628K per month. Top 3: 46% CN, 7% US, 6% RU and others 41%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its 78 partners
Marketplaces AWS
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Sonatype
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
SLA
Response
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 12 in common and 53 additional
All requirements from the same standards
20 standards, 12 in common and 8 additional
Detection
Remediation
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 1
2, all in common
Outputs
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 2
4, 3 in common and 1 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Sonatype
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
functionalities, 4 additional and 1 in common
Same, plus 1 functionality
1 functionality in common
CLI
CI/CD
SCA
24 package managers, 14 in common and 10 additional
18 package managers, 14 in common and 4 additional
Reachability
12 languages, 1 in common and 11 additional
1 language in common
SBOM
22 package managers, 10 in common and 12 additional
18 package managers, 10 in common and 8 additional
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
Same, plus 4
No
Source SAST (frameworks)
No
Binary SAST
1 type of binary, none in common
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
17 types of binaries, none in common
DAST

No

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
3 functions, 1 in common and 2 additional
2 functions, 1 in common and 1 additional
Open source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
No information available
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Sonatype
SCM
4, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
Ticketing
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

1 in common

ChatOps
None
None

None

IDE
2, all in common

6, 2 in common and 4 additional

CI/CD
20, 6 in common and 14 additional
6, all in common
SCA
Container

3

SAST

1

DAST

None

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
1 in common
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.